Skip to main content
IFRS Academy

CERTYNEX IFRS ACADEMY

Search the Academy

Home
My learning path
Exercises & quizzes
Cases
Workpapers
Exams
My progress

IFRS 12Workpapers (Step 4 of 5)

Workpaper assignment

Step 4 of 5
Mission · workpaperWorkpaper · IFRS 12L1 · Fundamental

Documents

Group profile and case conventions

Memo

Group profile and case conventions

Valmer Group SA (fictitious entity) closes its consolidated accounts on 31 December 20X6. Case conventions: amounts in EUR; the conclusions of management on control and significant influence are case data; case convention (pedagogical assumption, not attributed to IFRS 12): the dividends of Noral are paid in cash; the entry is illustrative.

Checklist of the scope, the level of detail and the significant judgments: control, joint control, significant influence and investment entity: Pestel — 18% of the voting rights

Objective, scope and significant judgments of a group: control without a majority, significant influence below 20 % and unconsolidated structured entity

5 documents7 sections to document
0 / 4 sections completed
Guided mode

Section 1 of 7

Objective

In progress
Section brief
What to document
The engagement, its scope and the working mode chosen.
Why
A workpaper answers one precise question: framing it avoids off-topic work.
How
Read the objective and the assignment, then choose the mode (guided, semi-guided, professional).
Expected result
You know which question the workpaper must settle, and for which reporting date.
Your role
Preparer of the IFRS 12 workpaper
Level
Foundation
Estimated time
≈ 60 min
Progress
0 / 3 steps done (review excluded)

Context

Valmer Group SA (fictitious entity) holds 36 % of the voting rights of Noral SA, 18 % of Pestel SA and units of the Quarvel fund. You prepare, for the 20X6 consolidated financial statements, the list of the interests to present and of the judgments to explain.

Assignment

Significant judgments on Noral and Pestel

Purpose of the workpaper

List the interests held in other entities and management's conclusion on control, joint control or significant influence, then decide which judgments to explain and the level of detail. Percentages of voting rights and attendance at meetings are case data: none is presented as a threshold of the standard, and materiality remains a judgment.

Questions of the file covered by this workpaper

  • In which category of interests does each investee fall, and what does IFRS 12 aim at?
  • Noral: what share of the votes cast does Valmer hold, and which judgment must be explained?
  • Pestel: which judgment must be explained about significant influence with less than 20 % of the voting rights?
  • Quarvel: is it a structured entity, and does Valmer consolidate it?
  • Which disclosures on the composition of the group and on the non-controlling interests of Noral must be provided?

Documents in the file

Open the documents to pick out the relevant information.

Choose how you want to work