IFRS 17 · Workpapers (Step 4 of 5)
Workpaper template
- Course
- Exercises
- Case studies
- Workpapers
- Exams
Portfolios, profitability groups and annual cohorts: grouping of contracts and loss of an onerous group at initial recognition
- Prepared by
- AI-assisted draft
- Reviewed by
- Not reviewed — human review required
- Status
- Published
Objective of the workpaper
Record the contracts of the portfolio (risks, management), their issue dates and the profitability expected at initial recognition. Then classify the group, check the rule of a maximum gap of one year between the contracts of a cohort, compute the loss of the onerous group, record it and write the conclusion. The fulfilment cash flows of the group are case data.
10 sections · 17 blocks · 1 calculation · 1 entry
- IFRS 17 §22
Work this workpaper as a mission
Each case that uses this template opens in the mission workspace: data, analysis, calculation, entries, conclusion and review, with your progress saved.
- Portfolios, profitability groups, annual cohorts, recognition and contract boundary, and the loss of an onerous groupOpen the mission · Motor — young drivers
- Portfolios, profitability groups, annual cohorts, recognition and contract boundary, and the loss of an onerous groupOpen the mission · Motor — experienced drivers
- Portfolios, profitability groups, annual cohorts, recognition and contract boundary, and the loss of an onerous groupOpen the mission · Motor — other drivers
- Portfolios, profitability groups, annual cohorts, recognition and contract boundary, and the loss of an onerous groupOpen the mission · Home — cohorts H1 to H4
- File on a group of insurance contracts: aggregation, initial measurement, contractual service margin, simplified approach and presentation (IFRS 17)Open the mission · Group G1
- File on a group of insurance contracts: aggregation, initial measurement, contractual service margin, simplified approach and presentation (IFRS 17)Open the mission · Group G2
6 instances from the cases: the calculations and entries below are run by the calculation engine.
- File and entity
- Portfolios, profitability groups, annual cohorts, recognition and contract boundary, and the loss of an onerous group
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify each of the three sets of motor contracts into its profitability group.
- Compute the loss of the onerous group at initial recognition.
- Record the loss of the onerous group.
- Which home contracts may be in the same group? May H1 and H4 be?
Facts and data
InputsContracts of the portfolio: products, risks covered, common management
TextRequired
MOTOR_CONTRACTS_WITH_SIMILAR_RISKS_AND_ONE_TEAM
Profitability expected at initial recognition and sensitivity analysis
Text
ACTUARIAL_NOTE_NET_OUTFLOW_FOR_THE_YOUNG_DRIVERS_SET
Issue dates of the contracts of the group
Text
Floor of the loss (zero)
Number
0
Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Number
36,000
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (contracts, actuarial profitability note, issue dates)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the grouping of contracts
AnalysisIFRS 17 §22
Points examined: portfolios, groups, cohorts, recognition and contract boundary
ChecklistRequired
- Portfolio: contracts exposed to similar risks and managed together
- Minimum division into three groups: onerous at inception, no significant possibility of becoming onerous, remaining
- No contract of a group issued more than one year apart
- Recognition date of the group: the earliest of three dates
- Contract boundary set by the substantive rights and obligations
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 17 §22
Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Calculation
36,000
Floor of the loss (zero) ; Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Illustrative entries
EntriesEntry of the loss of the onerous group
Entry
Account Debit Credit Loss on onerous group 36,000 Insurance contract liability 36,000
Judgments: classification of the group and annual cohorts
JudgmentIFRS 17 §22
Profitability group
JudgmentRequired
Group onerous at initial recognition
Group onerous at initial recognition / Group with no significant possibility of becoming onerous / Remaining group / Not applicable
Professional judgment: "significant possibility" is assessed on the profitability data of the case; no numerical threshold is imposed here.
Rationale: expected profitability, sensitivity to the assumptions, comparison with the other contracts of the portfolio
Text
FULFILMENT_CASH_FLOWS_ARE_A_NET_OUTFLOW_AT_INITIAL_RECOGNITION
Annual cohorts
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Contracts that may be in the same group: less than one year apart / Separate groups required: more than one year apart / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the one-year rule comes from IFRS 17; the exemption from annual cohorts is an exception specific to the European Union, never an option of the standards issued by the IASB.
Rationale: issue dates compared two by two and any exemption specific to the European Union invoked
Text
Items to document for the notes
DisclosureIFRS 17 §22
Information to prepare on the grouping
Checklist
- Composition of the portfolios and of the groups
- Loss recognised on the onerous groups
- Any use of the European Union exemption from annual cohorts
Effect on the financial statements
FS impactEffect derived from the entries
Table
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on the portfolio, the profitability group, the annual cohort and the loss recognised at inception
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Contracts of the portfolio describedPass
- Profitability group judged and supportedPass
- Annual cohort judged and supportedPass
- Loss entry balancedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 36,000
- Profit or loss
- -36,000
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- -36,000
- File and entity
- Portfolios, profitability groups, annual cohorts, recognition and contract boundary, and the loss of an onerous group
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify each of the three sets of motor contracts into its profitability group.
- Compute the loss of the onerous group at initial recognition.
- Record the loss of the onerous group.
- Which home contracts may be in the same group? May H1 and H4 be?
Facts and data
InputsContracts of the portfolio: products, risks covered, common management
TextRequired
MOTOR_CONTRACTS_WITH_SIMILAR_RISKS_AND_ONE_TEAM
Profitability expected at initial recognition and sensitivity analysis
Text
ACTUARIAL_NOTE_NET_INFLOW_AND_SENSITIVITY_FOR_THE_EXPERIENCED_SET
Issue dates of the contracts of the group
Text
Floor of the loss (zero)
Number
Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (contracts, actuarial profitability note, issue dates)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the grouping of contracts
AnalysisIFRS 17 §22
Points examined: portfolios, groups, cohorts, recognition and contract boundary
ChecklistRequired
- Portfolio: contracts exposed to similar risks and managed together
- Minimum division into three groups: onerous at inception, no significant possibility of becoming onerous, remaining
- No contract of a group issued more than one year apart
- Recognition date of the group: the earliest of three dates
- Contract boundary set by the substantive rights and obligations
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 17 §22
Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Calculation
Floor of the loss (zero) ; Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Illustrative entries
EntriesEntry of the loss of the onerous group
Entry
Debit Loss on onerous group ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows) ; Credit Insurance contract liability ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Judgments: classification of the group and annual cohorts
JudgmentIFRS 17 §22
Profitability group
JudgmentRequired
Group with no significant possibility of becoming onerous
Group onerous at initial recognition / Group with no significant possibility of becoming onerous / Remaining group / Not applicable
Professional judgment: "significant possibility" is assessed on the profitability data of the case; no numerical threshold is imposed here.
Rationale: expected profitability, sensitivity to the assumptions, comparison with the other contracts of the portfolio
Text
NET_INFLOW_STAYS_POSITIVE_WITH_20_PERCENT_MORE_CLAIMS
Annual cohorts
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Contracts that may be in the same group: less than one year apart / Separate groups required: more than one year apart / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the one-year rule comes from IFRS 17; the exemption from annual cohorts is an exception specific to the European Union, never an option of the standards issued by the IASB.
Rationale: issue dates compared two by two and any exemption specific to the European Union invoked
Text
Items to document for the notes
DisclosureIFRS 17 §22
Information to prepare on the grouping
Checklist
- Composition of the portfolios and of the groups
- Loss recognised on the onerous groups
- Any use of the European Union exemption from annual cohorts
Effect on the financial statements
FS impactEffect derived from the entries
Table
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on the portfolio, the profitability group, the annual cohort and the loss recognised at inception
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Contracts of the portfolio describedPass
- Profitability group judged and supportedPass
- Annual cohort judged and supportedPass
- Loss entry balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Portfolios, profitability groups, annual cohorts, recognition and contract boundary, and the loss of an onerous group
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify each of the three sets of motor contracts into its profitability group.
- Compute the loss of the onerous group at initial recognition.
- Record the loss of the onerous group.
- Which home contracts may be in the same group? May H1 and H4 be?
Facts and data
InputsContracts of the portfolio: products, risks covered, common management
TextRequired
MOTOR_CONTRACTS_WITH_SIMILAR_RISKS_AND_ONE_TEAM
Profitability expected at initial recognition and sensitivity analysis
Text
ACTUARIAL_NOTE_NET_INFLOW_AND_SENSITIVITY_FOR_THE_OTHER_SET
Issue dates of the contracts of the group
Text
Floor of the loss (zero)
Number
Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (contracts, actuarial profitability note, issue dates)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the grouping of contracts
AnalysisIFRS 17 §22
Points examined: portfolios, groups, cohorts, recognition and contract boundary
ChecklistRequired
- Portfolio: contracts exposed to similar risks and managed together
- Minimum division into three groups: onerous at inception, no significant possibility of becoming onerous, remaining
- No contract of a group issued more than one year apart
- Recognition date of the group: the earliest of three dates
- Contract boundary set by the substantive rights and obligations
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 17 §22
Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Calculation
Floor of the loss (zero) ; Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Illustrative entries
EntriesEntry of the loss of the onerous group
Entry
Debit Loss on onerous group ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows) ; Credit Insurance contract liability ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Judgments: classification of the group and annual cohorts
JudgmentIFRS 17 §22
Profitability group
JudgmentRequired
Remaining group
Group onerous at initial recognition / Group with no significant possibility of becoming onerous / Remaining group / Not applicable
Professional judgment: "significant possibility" is assessed on the profitability data of the case; no numerical threshold is imposed here.
Rationale: expected profitability, sensitivity to the assumptions, comparison with the other contracts of the portfolio
Text
A_PLAUSIBLE_RISE_OF_10_PERCENT_IN_CLAIMS_WOULD_TURN_THE_INFLOW_INTO_A_LOSS
Annual cohorts
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Contracts that may be in the same group: less than one year apart / Separate groups required: more than one year apart / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the one-year rule comes from IFRS 17; the exemption from annual cohorts is an exception specific to the European Union, never an option of the standards issued by the IASB.
Rationale: issue dates compared two by two and any exemption specific to the European Union invoked
Text
Items to document for the notes
DisclosureIFRS 17 §22
Information to prepare on the grouping
Checklist
- Composition of the portfolios and of the groups
- Loss recognised on the onerous groups
- Any use of the European Union exemption from annual cohorts
Effect on the financial statements
FS impactEffect derived from the entries
Table
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on the portfolio, the profitability group, the annual cohort and the loss recognised at inception
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Contracts of the portfolio describedPass
- Profitability group judged and supportedPass
- Annual cohort judged and supportedPass
- Loss entry balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Portfolios, profitability groups, annual cohorts, recognition and contract boundary, and the loss of an onerous group
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify each of the three sets of motor contracts into its profitability group.
- Compute the loss of the onerous group at initial recognition.
- Record the loss of the onerous group.
- Which home contracts may be in the same group? May H1 and H4 be?
Facts and data
InputsContracts of the portfolio: products, risks covered, common management
TextRequired
HOME_CONTRACTS_WITH_SIMILAR_RISKS_AND_ONE_TEAM
Profitability expected at initial recognition and sensitivity analysis
Text
Issue dates of the contracts of the group
Text
H1_10_MARCH_20X6_H2_21_SEPTEMBER_20X6_H3_15_FEBRUARY_20X7_H4_15_MARCH_20X7
Floor of the loss (zero)
Number
Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (contracts, actuarial profitability note, issue dates)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the grouping of contracts
AnalysisIFRS 17 §22
Points examined: portfolios, groups, cohorts, recognition and contract boundary
ChecklistRequired
- Portfolio: contracts exposed to similar risks and managed together
- Minimum division into three groups: onerous at inception, no significant possibility of becoming onerous, remaining
- No contract of a group issued more than one year apart
- Recognition date of the group: the earliest of three dates
- Contract boundary set by the substantive rights and obligations
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 17 §22
Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Calculation
Floor of the loss (zero) ; Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Illustrative entries
EntriesEntry of the loss of the onerous group
Entry
Debit Loss on onerous group ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows) ; Credit Insurance contract liability ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Judgments: classification of the group and annual cohorts
JudgmentIFRS 17 §22
Profitability group
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Group onerous at initial recognition / Group with no significant possibility of becoming onerous / Remaining group / Not applicable
Professional judgment: "significant possibility" is assessed on the profitability data of the case; no numerical threshold is imposed here.
Rationale: expected profitability, sensitivity to the assumptions, comparison with the other contracts of the portfolio
Text
Annual cohorts
JudgmentRequired
Separate groups required: more than one year apart
Contracts that may be in the same group: less than one year apart / Separate groups required: more than one year apart / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the one-year rule comes from IFRS 17; the exemption from annual cohorts is an exception specific to the European Union, never an option of the standards issued by the IASB.
Rationale: issue dates compared two by two and any exemption specific to the European Union invoked
Text
H4_IS_ISSUED_MORE_THAN_ONE_YEAR_AFTER_H1_AND_NO_EU_EXEMPTION_APPLIES_TO_THESE_CONTRACTS
Items to document for the notes
DisclosureIFRS 17 §22
Information to prepare on the grouping
Checklist
- Composition of the portfolios and of the groups
- Loss recognised on the onerous groups
- Any use of the European Union exemption from annual cohorts
Effect on the financial statements
FS impactEffect derived from the entries
Table
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on the portfolio, the profitability group, the annual cohort and the loss recognised at inception
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Contracts of the portfolio describedPass
- Profitability group judged and supportedPass
- Annual cohort judged and supportedPass
- Loss entry balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- File on a group of insurance contracts: aggregation, initial measurement, contractual service margin, simplified approach and presentation (IFRS 17)
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify G1 and G2 into their profitability group.
- May the contracts of G2 form a single cohort?
- Compute the loss of G2 at initial recognition.
- Record the loss of G2.
Facts and data
InputsContracts of the portfolio: products, risks covered, common management
TextRequired
COLLECTIVE_PROTECTION_CONTRACTS_WITH_SIMILAR_RISKS_AND_ONE_TEAM
Profitability expected at initial recognition and sensitivity analysis
Text
ACTUARIAL_NOTE_ON_G1
Issue dates of the contracts of the group
Text
Floor of the loss (zero)
Number
Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (contracts, actuarial profitability note, issue dates)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the grouping of contracts
AnalysisIFRS 17 §22
Points examined: portfolios, groups, cohorts, recognition and contract boundary
ChecklistRequired
- Portfolio: contracts exposed to similar risks and managed together
- Minimum division into three groups: onerous at inception, no significant possibility of becoming onerous, remaining
- No contract of a group issued more than one year apart
- Recognition date of the group: the earliest of three dates
- Contract boundary set by the substantive rights and obligations
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 17 §22
Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Calculation
Floor of the loss (zero) ; Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Illustrative entries
EntriesEntry of the loss of the onerous group
Entry
Debit Loss on onerous group ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows) ; Credit Insurance contract liability ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Judgments: classification of the group and annual cohorts
JudgmentIFRS 17 §22
Profitability group
JudgmentRequired
Group with no significant possibility of becoming onerous
Group onerous at initial recognition / Group with no significant possibility of becoming onerous / Remaining group / Not applicable
Professional judgment: "significant possibility" is assessed on the profitability data of the case; no numerical threshold is imposed here.
Rationale: expected profitability, sensitivity to the assumptions, comparison with the other contracts of the portfolio
Text
EXPECTED_MARGIN_STAYS_POSITIVE_UNDER_THE_ADVERSE_SCENARIOS
Annual cohorts
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Contracts that may be in the same group: less than one year apart / Separate groups required: more than one year apart / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the one-year rule comes from IFRS 17; the exemption from annual cohorts is an exception specific to the European Union, never an option of the standards issued by the IASB.
Rationale: issue dates compared two by two and any exemption specific to the European Union invoked
Text
Items to document for the notes
DisclosureIFRS 17 §22
Information to prepare on the grouping
Checklist
- Composition of the portfolios and of the groups
- Loss recognised on the onerous groups
- Any use of the European Union exemption from annual cohorts
Effect on the financial statements
FS impactEffect derived from the entries
Table
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on the portfolio, the profitability group, the annual cohort and the loss recognised at inception
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Contracts of the portfolio describedPass
- Profitability group judged and supportedPass
- Annual cohort judged and supportedPass
- Loss entry balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- File on a group of insurance contracts: aggregation, initial measurement, contractual service margin, simplified approach and presentation (IFRS 17)
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify G1 and G2 into their profitability group.
- May the contracts of G2 form a single cohort?
- Compute the loss of G2 at initial recognition.
- Record the loss of G2.
Facts and data
InputsContracts of the portfolio: products, risks covered, common management
TextRequired
COLLECTIVE_PROTECTION_CONTRACTS_WITH_SIMILAR_RISKS_AND_ONE_TEAM
Profitability expected at initial recognition and sensitivity analysis
Text
ACTUARIAL_NOTE_ON_G2
Issue dates of the contracts of the group
Text
FIRST_10_FEBRUARY_20X6_AND_LAST_20_OCTOBER_20X6
Floor of the loss (zero)
Number
0
Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Number
4,800
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (contracts, actuarial profitability note, issue dates)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the grouping of contracts
AnalysisIFRS 17 §22
Points examined: portfolios, groups, cohorts, recognition and contract boundary
ChecklistRequired
- Portfolio: contracts exposed to similar risks and managed together
- Minimum division into three groups: onerous at inception, no significant possibility of becoming onerous, remaining
- No contract of a group issued more than one year apart
- Recognition date of the group: the earliest of three dates
- Contract boundary set by the substantive rights and obligations
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 17 §22
Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Calculation
4,800
Floor of the loss (zero) ; Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Illustrative entries
EntriesEntry of the loss of the onerous group
Entry
Account Debit Credit Loss on onerous group 4,800 Insurance contract liability 4,800
Judgments: classification of the group and annual cohorts
JudgmentIFRS 17 §22
Profitability group
JudgmentRequired
Group onerous at initial recognition
Group onerous at initial recognition / Group with no significant possibility of becoming onerous / Remaining group / Not applicable
Professional judgment: "significant possibility" is assessed on the profitability data of the case; no numerical threshold is imposed here.
Rationale: expected profitability, sensitivity to the assumptions, comparison with the other contracts of the portfolio
Text
FULFILMENT_CASH_FLOWS_ARE_A_NET_OUTFLOW_AT_INITIAL_RECOGNITION
Annual cohorts
JudgmentRequired
Contracts that may be in the same group: less than one year apart
Contracts that may be in the same group: less than one year apart / Separate groups required: more than one year apart / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the one-year rule comes from IFRS 17; the exemption from annual cohorts is an exception specific to the European Union, never an option of the standards issued by the IASB.
Rationale: issue dates compared two by two and any exemption specific to the European Union invoked
Text
FIRST_AND_LAST_CONTRACTS_ARE_LESS_THAN_ONE_YEAR_APART_AND_NO_EU_EXEMPTION_IS_USED
Items to document for the notes
DisclosureIFRS 17 §22
Information to prepare on the grouping
Checklist
- Composition of the portfolios and of the groups
- Loss recognised on the onerous groups
- Any use of the European Union exemption from annual cohorts
Effect on the financial statements
FS impactEffect derived from the entries
Table
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on the portfolio, the profitability group, the annual cohort and the loss recognised at inception
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Contracts of the portfolio describedPass
- Profitability group judged and supportedPass
- Annual cohort judged and supportedPass
- Loss entry balancedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 4,800
- Profit or loss
- -4,800
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- -4,800
Facts and data
InputsContracts of the portfolio: products, risks covered, common management
TextRequired
Profitability expected at initial recognition and sensitivity analysis
Text
Issue dates of the contracts of the group
Text
Floor of the loss (zero)
Number
Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (contracts, actuarial profitability note, issue dates)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the grouping of contracts
AnalysisIFRS 17 §22
Points examined: portfolios, groups, cohorts, recognition and contract boundary
ChecklistRequired
- Portfolio: contracts exposed to similar risks and managed together
- Minimum division into three groups: onerous at inception, no significant possibility of becoming onerous, remaining
- No contract of a group issued more than one year apart
- Recognition date of the group: the earliest of three dates
- Contract boundary set by the substantive rights and obligations
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 17 §22
Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Calculation
Floor of the loss (zero) ; Fulfilment cash flows of the group (net outflow)
Illustrative entries
EntriesEntry of the loss of the onerous group
Entry
Debit Loss on onerous group ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows) ; Credit Insurance contract liability ← Loss at initial recognition (the higher of zero and the fulfilment cash flows)
Judgments: classification of the group and annual cohorts
JudgmentIFRS 17 §22
Profitability group
JudgmentRequired
Group onerous at initial recognition / Group with no significant possibility of becoming onerous / Remaining group / Not applicable
Professional judgment: "significant possibility" is assessed on the profitability data of the case; no numerical threshold is imposed here.
Rationale: expected profitability, sensitivity to the assumptions, comparison with the other contracts of the portfolio
Text
Annual cohorts
JudgmentRequired
Contracts that may be in the same group: less than one year apart / Separate groups required: more than one year apart / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the one-year rule comes from IFRS 17; the exemption from annual cohorts is an exception specific to the European Union, never an option of the standards issued by the IASB.
Rationale: issue dates compared two by two and any exemption specific to the European Union invoked
Text
Items to document for the notes
DisclosureIFRS 17 §22
Information to prepare on the grouping
Checklist
- Composition of the portfolios and of the groups
- Loss recognised on the onerous groups
- Any use of the European Union exemption from annual cohorts
Effect on the financial statements
FS impactEffect derived from the entries
Table
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on the portfolio, the profitability group, the annual cohort and the loss recognised at inception
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References