After long debates, Plairgence's technical committee concludes that a change cannot be classified with certainty as either a policy or an estimate. It decides to treat it retrospectively, 'for prudence'. What is the error?
After long debates, Plairgence's technical committee concludes that a change cannot be classified with certainty as either a policy or an estimate. It decides to treat it retrospectively, 'for prudence'. What is the error?