You follow the closing of Ferlianne Robinetterie during the window between 31 December N and the authorisation of the financial statements for issue, then through year N+1 and the start of N+2. A lawsuit is settled, a customer goes bankrupt, valves are sold at a loss, a fire hits the warehouse, a dividend is proposed; a year later, the loss of a major customer and a refusal by the bank raise the question of going concern. For each event, the central question is the same: did the condition exist at the reporting date? Then: which standard measures the effect? All figures, dates and the governance are case data; teaching assumptions and professional judgements are flagged as such, and no method or estimate chosen by Ferlianne is presented as required by the standards. Teaching assumptions: income tax effects are ignored; Ferlianne does not publish interim financial information.
Standards involved: IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period (definition, adjusting and non-adjusting events), IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (best estimate of a provision) and IAS 2 Inventories (net realisable value). The draft N financial statements were prepared on 10 January N+1; sort the January news, quantify the adjustments and record the entries at 31 December N.