IAS 37 · Workpapers (Step 4 of 5)
Workpaper template
- Course
- Exercises
- Case studies
- Workpapers
- Exams
Recognition analysis of provisions and contingencies
- Prepared by
- AI-assisted draft
- Reviewed by
- Not reviewed — human review required
- Status
- Published
Objective of the workpaper
For each situation, check the scope, whether a present obligation arises from a past event, the probability of the outflow of resources and whether a reliable estimate can be made; classify the situation (provision, contingent liability disclosed or not, contingent asset, asset recognised), record the entries and pass the items of the note.
14 sections · 32 blocks · 2 calculations · 2 entries
- IAS 37
- IAS 37
- IAS 37 §3
- IAS 37
- IAS 37
- IAS 37 §8
- IAS 37 §10
- IAS 37 §11
- IAS 37 §13
- IAS 37 §14
- IAS 37 §15
- IAS 37 §16
- IAS 37 §17
- IAS 37 §18
- IAS 37 §19
- IAS 37
- IAS 37
- IAS 37
- IAS 37 §23
- IAS 37 §24
- IAS 37 §25
- IAS 37
- IAS 37 §27
- IAS 37 §28
- IAS 37 §29
- IAS 37 §30
- IAS 37 §31
- IAS 37 §32
- IAS 37 §33
- IAS 37 §34
- IAS 37
- IAS 37 §84
- IAS 37 §86
- IAS 37
- IAS 37
Work this workpaper as a mission
Each case that uses this template opens in the mission workspace: data, analysis, calculation, entries, conclusion and review, with your progress saved.
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent assetOpen the mission · Warranties on products sold
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent assetOpen the mission · Clean-up of the shared site
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent assetOpen the mission · Ruvalis lawsuit
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent assetOpen the mission · Former sales agent's claim
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent assetOpen the mission · Claim against Faldaro
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial groupOpen the mission · Merquin pump warranties
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial groupOpen the mission · Corvella dispute
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial groupOpen the mission · Quessandre shared site
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial groupOpen the mission · Patent settlement with Arcantis
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial groupOpen the mission · Talvorne castings claim
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial groupOpen the mission · Rocbrune competition inquiry
11 instances from the cases: the calculations and entries below are run by the calculation engine.
- File and entity
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent asset
- Case tasks documented here
- For each situation, is there a liability at the reporting date? Distinguish a provision, an accrual and the absence of an obligation.
- Calculate the warranty provision at 31 December 20X1.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the clean-up obligation.
- Classify the Ruvalis lawsuit, the former agent's claim and the claim against Faldaro.
- Record the entries at 31 December 20X1.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
PRODUCT_WARRANTIES
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X1-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
SALES_UNDER_WARRANTY
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
92,500
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Account Debit Credit Provision expense 92,500 Provision 92,500 Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Present legal obligation
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Outflow probable (more likely than not)
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Provision recognised
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
92,500
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedPass
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 92,500
- Profit or loss
- -92,500
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- -92,500
- File and entity
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent asset
- Case tasks documented here
- For each situation, is there a liability at the reporting date? Distinguish a provision, an accrual and the absence of an obligation.
- Calculate the warranty provision at 31 December 20X1.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the clean-up obligation.
- Classify the Ruvalis lawsuit, the former agent's claim and the claim against Faldaro.
- Record the entries at 31 December 20X1.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
JOINT_SITE_CLEANUP
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X1-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
SOIL_POLLUTION_BEFORE_CLOSING
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
640,000
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
35 %
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
224,000
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
416,000
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Account Debit Credit Provision expense 224,000 Provision 224,000 Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Present legal obligation
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Outflow probable (more likely than not)
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Provision recognised
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
224,000
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
416,000
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable sharePass
- The provision entry is balancedPass
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 224,000
- Profit or loss
- -224,000
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- -224,000
- File and entity
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent asset
- Case tasks documented here
- For each situation, is there a liability at the reporting date? Distinguish a provision, an accrual and the absence of an obligation.
- Calculate the warranty provision at 31 December 20X1.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the clean-up obligation.
- Classify the Ruvalis lawsuit, the former agent's claim and the claim against Faldaro.
- Record the entries at 31 December 20X1.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
RUVALIS_LAWSUIT
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X1-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
WATER_DAMAGE_AT_CUSTOMER
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
EXPERT_REPORT_AFTER_CLOSING
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
180,000
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Debit Provision expense ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision) ; Credit Provision ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events)
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Outflow not probable but not remote
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Contingent liability disclosed in the notes
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
0
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
180,000
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedNot evaluated
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent asset
- Case tasks documented here
- For each situation, is there a liability at the reporting date? Distinguish a provision, an accrual and the absence of an obligation.
- Calculate the warranty provision at 31 December 20X1.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the clean-up obligation.
- Classify the Ruvalis lawsuit, the former agent's claim and the claim against Faldaro.
- Record the entries at 31 December 20X1.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
FORMER_AGENT_CLAIM
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X1-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
TERMINATED_AGENCY_CONTRACT
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
40,000
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Debit Provision expense ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision) ; Credit Provision ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events)
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Outflow remote
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote)
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
0
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedNot evaluated
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Warranties, shared pollution, lawsuits and a claim: provision, contingent liability or contingent asset
- Case tasks documented here
- For each situation, is there a liability at the reporting date? Distinguish a provision, an accrual and the absence of an obligation.
- Calculate the warranty provision at 31 December 20X1.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the clean-up obligation.
- Classify the Ruvalis lawsuit, the former agent's claim and the claim against Faldaro.
- Record the entries at 31 December 20X1.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
FALDARO_CLAIM
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X1-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
DEFECTIVE_THERMOSTATS_SUPPLIED
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
80,000
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Debit Provision expense ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision) ; Credit Provision ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Inflow probable but not virtually certain
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Contingent asset disclosed in the notes
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
0
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
80,000
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedNot evaluated
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial group
- Case tasks documented here
- Analyse the file: which situations should be examined, which documents are useful and what information is missing?
- Classify each situation: provision, contingent liability, contingent asset or recognised asset.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the Quessandre obligation.
- Record the closing entries.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
MERQUIN_PUMP_WARRANTIES
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X5-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
SALES_UNDER_WARRANTY_20X5
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
137,000
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Account Debit Credit Provision expense 137,000 Provision 137,000 Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Present legal obligation
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Outflow probable (more likely than not)
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Provision recognised
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
137,000
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedPass
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 137,000
- Profit or loss
- -137,000
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- -137,000
- File and entity
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial group
- Case tasks documented here
- Analyse the file: which situations should be examined, which documents are useful and what information is missing?
- Classify each situation: provision, contingent liability, contingent asset or recognised asset.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the Quessandre obligation.
- Record the closing entries.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
CORVELLA_CROP_LOSS_CLAIM
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X5-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
PUMP_FAILURES_20X4
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
EXPERT_REPORT_AFTER_CLOSING
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
500,000
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Account Debit Credit Provision expense 500,000 Provision 500,000 Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Present legal obligation
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Outflow probable (more likely than not)
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Provision recognised
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
500,000
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedPass
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 500,000
- Profit or loss
- -500,000
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- -500,000
- File and entity
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial group
- Case tasks documented here
- Analyse the file: which situations should be examined, which documents are useful and what information is missing?
- Classify each situation: provision, contingent liability, contingent asset or recognised asset.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the Quessandre obligation.
- Record the closing entries.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
QUESSANDRE_SITE_DECONTAMINATION
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X5-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
PAST_STORAGE_POLLUTION
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
1,200,000
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
65 %
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
780,000
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
420,000
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Debit Provision expense ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision) ; Credit Provision ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Present legal obligation
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Outflow probable (more likely than not)
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Provision recognised
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
420,000
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedNot evaluated
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial group
- Case tasks documented here
- Analyse the file: which situations should be examined, which documents are useful and what information is missing?
- Classify each situation: provision, contingent liability, contingent asset or recognised asset.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the Quessandre obligation.
- Record the closing entries.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
ARCANTIS_PATENT_SETTLEMENT
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X5-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
SETTLEMENT_SIGNED_20X5
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
210,000
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Debit Provision expense ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision) ; Credit Provision ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Account Debit Credit Receivable 210,000 Other income 210,000
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Inflow virtually certain
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain)
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
210,000
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedNot evaluated
- The asset entry is balancedPass
- Assets
- 210,000
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 210,000
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 210,000
- File and entity
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial group
- Case tasks documented here
- Analyse the file: which situations should be examined, which documents are useful and what information is missing?
- Classify each situation: provision, contingent liability, contingent asset or recognised asset.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the Quessandre obligation.
- Record the closing entries.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
TALVORNE_DEFECTIVE_CASTINGS_CLAIM
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X5-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
DEFECTIVE_CASTINGS
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
340,000
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Debit Provision expense ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision) ; Credit Provision ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Inflow probable but not virtually certain
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Contingent asset disclosed in the notes
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
0
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
340,000
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedNot evaluated
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Professional file: review of the provisions and contingencies of an industrial group
- Case tasks documented here
- Analyse the file: which situations should be examined, which documents are useful and what information is missing?
- Classify each situation: provision, contingent liability, contingent asset or recognised asset.
- Calculate the provisioned share and the contingent liability share of the Quessandre obligation.
- Record the closing entries.
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
ROCBRUNE_COMPETITION_INQUIRY
Reporting date
DateRequired
20X5-12-31
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
PAST_PRICING_PRACTICES
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Debit Provision expense ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision) ; Credit Provision ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events)
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Outflow not probable but not remote
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Contingent liability disclosed in the notes
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
0
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- The scope assessment is documentedPass
- The existence of a present obligation is documentedPass
- The probability of the outflow or inflow is documentedPass
- The treatment retained is statedPass
- The amount provided for a joint and several obligation is the entity's probable shareNot evaluated
- The provision entry is balancedNot evaluated
- The asset entry is balancedNot evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
Inputs
InputsSituation examined (facts, counterparty, nature of the dispute, warranty or commitment)
TextRequired
Reporting date
DateRequired
Past event relied on and date (possible obligating event)
Text
Opinions of counsel and experts, events after the reporting period
Text
Best estimate of the outflow of resources (measured in “Measurement of the provision” where needed)
Number
Amount of the expected inflow of economic benefits (claim, compensation)
Number
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable
Number
Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Number
Case data or documented estimate of the entity (ability of the other parties to pay, for example); this model imposes no method of apportionment.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Scope
AnalysisIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §3IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §8
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Executory contract (neither party has performed its obligations, or both have partially performed to an equal extent): outside the scope unless onerous
- Financial instrument, including a guarantee, within the scope of IFRS 9: outside the scope
- Item dealt with by another standard (IAS 12, IFRS 16, IAS 19, IFRS 17, IFRS 3, IFRS 15): that standard applies, except for a contract with a customer or certain leases that have become onerous
- Depreciation, impairment of assets or doubtful debts: adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset, not a provision
- Debit side of the provision: expense or asset according to the standard applying to the expenditure (IAS 37 neither requires nor prohibits capitalisation)
Present obligation and past event
AnalysisIAS 37 §10IAS 37 §11IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §17IAS 37 §18IAS 37 §19IAS 37IAS 37IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Legal obligation (contract, legislation) or constructive obligation (past practice, published policy, specific statement creating a valid expectation) leaving no realistic alternative to settling it
- Obligation existing independently of the future conduct of the business; no provision for costs needed to operate in the future
- Decision of management or the board: constructive obligation only if communicated before the reporting date to those affected in a sufficiently specific manner
- New legislation (virtually certain to be enacted as drafted) or public commitment of the entity turning a past event into an obligating event
- Disputed existence (lawsuit): present obligation if more likely than not in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and events after the reporting period
- Uncertainty about timing or amount distinguishing the provision from a trade payable or an accrual
Recognition criteria
AnalysisIAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §24IAS 37 §25IAS 37
Points examined
ChecklistRequired
- Three cumulative conditions: present obligation as a result of a past event, probable outflow of resources, reliable estimate
- Probable outflow: more likely than not
- Similar obligations (warranties): probability assessed for the class as a whole
- Reliable estimate possible except in extremely rare cases; otherwise, contingent liability disclosed
- Provision (present obligation meeting the criteria) or contingent liability (possible obligation, or present obligation not meeting them)
Contingent liabilities
AnalysisIAS 37 §27IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §30
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent liability never recognised
- Disclosed unless the outflow of resources is remote
- Joint and several liability: part of the entity for which an outflow is probable provided for, part expected to be met by the other parties treated as a contingent liability
- Continual reassessment: provision in the period in which the outflow becomes probable
Contingent assets
AnalysisIAS 37 §31IAS 37 §32IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34IAS 37
Points examined
Checklist
- Contingent asset (claim pursued through legal processes with an uncertain outcome, for example) never recognised
- Disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Inflow virtually certain: the asset is no longer contingent; asset and income recognised in the period of the change
- Asymmetric thresholds: probable outflow for a provision, virtually certain inflow for an asset
Joint and several obligation
CalculationsIAS 37 §29
Share provided for (total obligation × entity's probable share)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Share treated as a contingent liability (total obligation − share provided for)
Calculation
Total obligation for which the entity is jointly and severally liable ; Share of the obligation for which an outflow of resources from the entity is probable (%)
Journal entries
EntriesRecognition of the provision
Entry
Debit Provision expense ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision) ; Credit Provision ← Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Teaching assumption: the provision is recognised as an expense; where the standard applying to the expenditure requires it to be included in the cost of an asset (para. 8), the debit changes (see “Measurement of the provision”).
Recognition of the asset that has become virtually certain
Entry
Debit Receivable ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise) ; Credit Other income ← Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Classification of the situation
JudgmentIAS 37IAS 37IAS 37 §13IAS 37 §14IAS 37 §15IAS 37 §16IAS 37 §23IAS 37 §28IAS 37 §29IAS 37 §33IAS 37 §34
Standard applicable to the situation
JudgmentRequired
Within the scope of IAS 37 / Within the scope of another standard / Executory contract that is not onerous (outside the scope) / Adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset (outside the scope)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Obligation at the reporting date
JudgmentRequired
Present legal obligation / Present constructive obligation / Possible obligation (existence to be confirmed by uncertain future events) / No obligation (future costs the entity can avoid) / Not applicable (contingent asset situation)
Professional judgement: where in doubt, the existence of the obligation is assessed in the light of all available evidence, including experts' opinions and later events (paras. 15 and 16).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Probability of the outflow or inflow of resources
JudgmentRequired
Outflow probable (more likely than not) / Outflow not probable but not remote / Outflow remote / Inflow virtually certain / Inflow probable but not virtually certain / Inflow not probable
Professional judgement: probable means more likely than not (para. 23). This model puts no figure on remote or virtually certain; a numerical threshold given by a case is an assumption of that case.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Treatment retained
ChoiceRequired
Provision recognised / Contingent liability disclosed in the notes / Contingent liability not disclosed (outflow remote) / No liability (neither provision nor disclosure) / Contingent asset disclosed in the notes / Contingent asset not disclosed (inflow not probable) / Asset and income recognised (inflow virtually certain) / Outside the scope of IAS 37
Amount recognised as a provision (0 if no provision)
Number
The amount follows from the classification: best estimate of the outflow if a provision is recognised, the entity's probable share for a joint and several obligation (para. 29), 0 otherwise.
Amount recognised as an asset (inflow virtually certain; 0 otherwise)
Number
Estimated financial effect disclosed (contingent liability or asset)
Number
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification of the situation, amounts recognised or disclosed and entries
ConclusionRequired
Financial statement impact
FS impactImpact by caption, derived from the entries above (the Notes line refers to the disclosures)
TableRequired
Items passed to the note
DisclosureIAS 37 §28IAS 37 §34IAS 37 §84IAS 37 §86IAS 37IAS 37
Items passed to the notes workpaper (“Note: provisions and contingencies”)
ChecklistRequired
- Class of the provision and amount provided (roll-forward)
- Contingent liability not remote: nature, estimate of the financial effect where practicable, uncertainties, possibility of reimbursement
- Contingent asset with a probable inflow: nature and estimate of the financial effect where practicable
- Provision and contingent liability arising from the same circumstances: link to be shown
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper (verification status shown from the register)
References