IAS 40 · Workpapers (Step 4 of 5)
Workpaper template
- Course
- Exercises
- Case studies
- Workpapers
- Exams
Classification and mixed-use file
- Prepared by
- AI-assisted draft
- Reviewed by
- Not reviewed — human review required
- Status
- Published
Objective of the workpaper
For each property (one instance per property), describe the facts, state whether the portions can be sold separately, enter the share occupied by the entity and the share of services in the whole arrangement, then justify the classification (whole investment property, separate accounting or owner-occupied property) and whether the services are significant. The standard sets no thresholds: classification is a matter of judgement and is documented by the facts relied on.
7 sections · 14 blocks · 0 calculations · 0 entries
- IAS 40 §5
- IAS 40 §7
- IAS 40 §10
- IAS 40 §11
- IAS 40 §12
- IAS 40 §13
- IAS 40 §15
- IAS 40 §14
Work this workpaper as a mission
Each case that uses this template opens in the mission workspace: data, analysis, calculation, entries, conclusion and review, with your progress saved.
- Mixed-use building and services to occupants: classification judgementOpen the mission · Building A — mixed use
- Mixed-use building and services to occupants: classification judgementOpen the mission · Building B — services to occupants
- File of an investment property portfolio: classification, measurement, transfers and disclosuresOpen the mission · Property M1 — mixed use
- File of an investment property portfolio: classification, measurement, transfers and disclosuresOpen the mission · Property M2 — services
4 instances from the cases: the calculations and entries below are run by the calculation engine.
- File and entity
- Mixed-use building and services to occupants: classification judgement
- Case tasks documented here
- Compute the occupied share of building A and the share of services of building B.
- Classify building A. Justify.
- Classify building B. Justify.
Inputs
InputsProperty: nature, occupants, leases and use by the entity
Text
IMMEUBLE_USAGE_MIXTE_BATIMENT_A
Can the portions be sold or leased separately?
Choice
Portions not separable
Portions separately saleable or leasable / Portions not separable
Share of the area occupied by the entity (in %)
Number
7.5 %
Services provided to occupants: nature and contracts
Text
Share of services in the total income of the arrangement (in %)
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the classification
AnalysisIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Points reviewed: holding purpose, separability, own use, services, intragroup lease
ChecklistRequired
- Property held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation
- Separability of the portions checked
- Portion used by the entity identified and measured
- Ancillary services provided to occupants reviewed
- Intragroup lease reviewed (individual and consolidated statements)
Judgements
JudgmentIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Classification of a mixed-use property
JudgmentRequired
Investment property in its entirety (owner-occupied portion insignificant)
Investment property in its entirety (owner-occupied portion insignificant) / Separate accounting of the portions / Owner-occupied property in its entirety
Rule and cross-reference: if the portions can be sold separately, they are accounted for separately; otherwise the property is investment property only if the owner-occupied portion is insignificant (IAS 40, para. 10). The standard gives no percentage.
Rationale: facts relied on, separability, occupied share, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Significance of the services provided to occupants
JudgmentRequired
Insignificant ancillary services: the property remains investment property / Significant services: owner-occupied property
Rule and cross-reference: if the ancillary services provided to occupants are a relatively insignificant component of the arrangement as a whole, the property remains investment property; the assessment rests on the facts (IAS 40, paras. 11 and 13).
Rationale: nature of the services, weight in the arrangement, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification retained and judgements submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Disclosures
DisclosureIAS 40 §10IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §14
Disclosures on classification
ChecklistRequired
- Classification criteria disclosed when classification is difficult
- Any split and the judgements noted
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper and their verification status
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Judgement on mixed use documentedPass
- Judgement on services documentedNot filled in this instance
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Mixed-use building and services to occupants: classification judgement
- Case tasks documented here
- Compute the occupied share of building A and the share of services of building B.
- Classify building A. Justify.
- Classify building B. Justify.
Inputs
InputsProperty: nature, occupants, leases and use by the entity
Text
IMMEUBLE_DE_BUREAUX_BATIMENT_B
Can the portions be sold or leased separately?
Choice
Portions separately saleable or leasable / Portions not separable
Share of the area occupied by the entity (in %)
Number
Services provided to occupants: nature and contracts
Text
SECURITE_ACCUEIL_ENTRETIEN_PARTIES_COMMUNES
Share of services in the total income of the arrangement (in %)
Number
8 %
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the classification
AnalysisIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Points reviewed: holding purpose, separability, own use, services, intragroup lease
ChecklistRequired
- Property held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation
- Separability of the portions checked
- Portion used by the entity identified and measured
- Ancillary services provided to occupants reviewed
- Intragroup lease reviewed (individual and consolidated statements)
Judgements
JudgmentIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Classification of a mixed-use property
JudgmentRequired
Investment property in its entirety (owner-occupied portion insignificant) / Separate accounting of the portions / Owner-occupied property in its entirety
Rule and cross-reference: if the portions can be sold separately, they are accounted for separately; otherwise the property is investment property only if the owner-occupied portion is insignificant (IAS 40, para. 10). The standard gives no percentage.
Rationale: facts relied on, separability, occupied share, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Significance of the services provided to occupants
JudgmentRequired
Insignificant ancillary services: the property remains investment property
Insignificant ancillary services: the property remains investment property / Significant services: owner-occupied property
Rule and cross-reference: if the ancillary services provided to occupants are a relatively insignificant component of the arrangement as a whole, the property remains investment property; the assessment rests on the facts (IAS 40, paras. 11 and 13).
Rationale: nature of the services, weight in the arrangement, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification retained and judgements submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Disclosures
DisclosureIAS 40 §10IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §14
Disclosures on classification
ChecklistRequired
- Classification criteria disclosed when classification is difficult
- Any split and the judgements noted
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper and their verification status
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Judgement on mixed use documentedNot filled in this instance
- Judgement on services documentedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- File of an investment property portfolio: classification, measurement, transfers and disclosures
- Case tasks documented here
- Compute the occupied share of M1 and the share of services of M2.
- Classify M1. Justify.
- Classify M2. Justify.
Inputs
InputsProperty: nature, occupants, leases and use by the entity
Text
IMMEUBLE_USAGE_MIXTE_M1
Can the portions be sold or leased separately?
Choice
Portions not separable
Portions separately saleable or leasable / Portions not separable
Share of the area occupied by the entity (in %)
Number
6 %
Services provided to occupants: nature and contracts
Text
Share of services in the total income of the arrangement (in %)
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the classification
AnalysisIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Points reviewed: holding purpose, separability, own use, services, intragroup lease
ChecklistRequired
- Property held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation
- Separability of the portions checked
- Portion used by the entity identified and measured
- Ancillary services provided to occupants reviewed
- Intragroup lease reviewed (individual and consolidated statements)
Judgements
JudgmentIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Classification of a mixed-use property
JudgmentRequired
Investment property in its entirety (owner-occupied portion insignificant)
Investment property in its entirety (owner-occupied portion insignificant) / Separate accounting of the portions / Owner-occupied property in its entirety
Rule and cross-reference: if the portions can be sold separately, they are accounted for separately; otherwise the property is investment property only if the owner-occupied portion is insignificant (IAS 40, para. 10). The standard gives no percentage.
Rationale: facts relied on, separability, occupied share, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Significance of the services provided to occupants
JudgmentRequired
Insignificant ancillary services: the property remains investment property / Significant services: owner-occupied property
Rule and cross-reference: if the ancillary services provided to occupants are a relatively insignificant component of the arrangement as a whole, the property remains investment property; the assessment rests on the facts (IAS 40, paras. 11 and 13).
Rationale: nature of the services, weight in the arrangement, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification retained and judgements submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Disclosures
DisclosureIAS 40 §10IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §14
Disclosures on classification
ChecklistRequired
- Classification criteria disclosed when classification is difficult
- Any split and the judgements noted
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper and their verification status
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Judgement on mixed use documentedPass
- Judgement on services documentedNot filled in this instance
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- File of an investment property portfolio: classification, measurement, transfers and disclosures
- Case tasks documented here
- Compute the occupied share of M1 and the share of services of M2.
- Classify M1. Justify.
- Classify M2. Justify.
Inputs
InputsProperty: nature, occupants, leases and use by the entity
Text
IMMEUBLE_DE_BUREAUX_M2
Can the portions be sold or leased separately?
Choice
Portions separately saleable or leasable / Portions not separable
Share of the area occupied by the entity (in %)
Number
Services provided to occupants: nature and contracts
Text
SECURITE_ACCUEIL_ENTRETIEN_PARTIES_COMMUNES
Share of services in the total income of the arrangement (in %)
Number
8 %
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the classification
AnalysisIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Points reviewed: holding purpose, separability, own use, services, intragroup lease
ChecklistRequired
- Property held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation
- Separability of the portions checked
- Portion used by the entity identified and measured
- Ancillary services provided to occupants reviewed
- Intragroup lease reviewed (individual and consolidated statements)
Judgements
JudgmentIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Classification of a mixed-use property
JudgmentRequired
Investment property in its entirety (owner-occupied portion insignificant) / Separate accounting of the portions / Owner-occupied property in its entirety
Rule and cross-reference: if the portions can be sold separately, they are accounted for separately; otherwise the property is investment property only if the owner-occupied portion is insignificant (IAS 40, para. 10). The standard gives no percentage.
Rationale: facts relied on, separability, occupied share, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Significance of the services provided to occupants
JudgmentRequired
Insignificant ancillary services: the property remains investment property
Insignificant ancillary services: the property remains investment property / Significant services: owner-occupied property
Rule and cross-reference: if the ancillary services provided to occupants are a relatively insignificant component of the arrangement as a whole, the property remains investment property; the assessment rests on the facts (IAS 40, paras. 11 and 13).
Rationale: nature of the services, weight in the arrangement, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification retained and judgements submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Disclosures
DisclosureIAS 40 §10IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §14
Disclosures on classification
ChecklistRequired
- Classification criteria disclosed when classification is difficult
- Any split and the judgements noted
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper and their verification status
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Judgement on mixed use documentedNot filled in this instance
- Judgement on services documentedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
Inputs
InputsProperty: nature, occupants, leases and use by the entity
Text
Can the portions be sold or leased separately?
Choice
Portions separately saleable or leasable / Portions not separable
Share of the area occupied by the entity (in %)
Number
Services provided to occupants: nature and contracts
Text
Share of services in the total income of the arrangement (in %)
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the classification
AnalysisIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Points reviewed: holding purpose, separability, own use, services, intragroup lease
ChecklistRequired
- Property held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation
- Separability of the portions checked
- Portion used by the entity identified and measured
- Ancillary services provided to occupants reviewed
- Intragroup lease reviewed (individual and consolidated statements)
Judgements
JudgmentIAS 40 §5IAS 40 §7IAS 40 §10IAS 40 §11IAS 40 §12IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §15
Classification of a mixed-use property
JudgmentRequired
Investment property in its entirety (owner-occupied portion insignificant) / Separate accounting of the portions / Owner-occupied property in its entirety
Rule and cross-reference: if the portions can be sold separately, they are accounted for separately; otherwise the property is investment property only if the owner-occupied portion is insignificant (IAS 40, para. 10). The standard gives no percentage.
Rationale: facts relied on, separability, occupied share, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Significance of the services provided to occupants
JudgmentRequired
Insignificant ancillary services: the property remains investment property / Significant services: owner-occupied property
Rule and cross-reference: if the ancillary services provided to occupants are a relatively insignificant component of the arrangement as a whole, the property remains investment property; the assessment rests on the facts (IAS 40, paras. 11 and 13).
Rationale: nature of the services, weight in the arrangement, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification retained and judgements submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Disclosures
DisclosureIAS 40 §10IAS 40 §13IAS 40 §14
Disclosures on classification
ChecklistRequired
- Classification criteria disclosed when classification is difficult
- Any split and the judgements noted
Normative references
ReferencesParagraphs cited in this workpaper and their verification status
References