IFRS 11 · Workpapers (Step 4 of 5)
Workpaper template
- Course
- Exercises
- Case studies
- Workpapers
- Exams
Classification of a joint arrangement: joint control, separate vehicle, legal form, contractual terms and other facts and circumstances
- Prepared by
- AI-assisted draft
- Reviewed by
- Not reviewed — human review required
- Status
- Published
Objective of the workpaper
Describe the arrangement, the decisions on the relevant activities and the consent they require, then the vehicle if any, its legal form, the terms of the arrangement and the other facts and circumstances. Percentages, decision thresholds and amounts are case data: none is presented as imposed by the standard, and the classification remains a judgment supported by the enforceable rights and obligations of the parties.
8 sections · 25 blocks · 1 calculation · 0 entries
- IFRS 11
- IFRS 11 §14
- IFRS 11 §B16
- IFRS 11 §B30
Work this workpaper as a mission
Each case that uses this template opens in the mission workspace: data, analysis, calculation, entries, conclusion and review, with your progress saved.
- Joint arrangement without a separate vehicle: joint control, unanimity, classification as a joint operation and party without joint controlOpen the mission · Depot held by the four parties
- Joint arrangement without a separate vehicle: joint control, unanimity, classification as a joint operation and party without joint controlOpen the mission · Rivane — 10% of the capacity
- Joint arrangement with a separate vehicle: voting pattern, legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances and the 2015 Committee decisionOpen the mission · Hanvir
- Joint arrangement with a separate vehicle: voting pattern, legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances and the 2015 Committee decisionOpen the mission · Kelmar
- Joint arrangement file: joint control, classification, accounting of the joint operator or joint venturer and separate financial statements (IFRS 11)Open the mission · Marlaix — shared depot
- Joint arrangement file: joint control, classification, accounting of the joint operator or joint venturer and separate financial statements (IFRS 11)Open the mission · Hestial
6 instances from the cases: the calculations and entries below are run by the calculation engine.
- File and entity
- Joint arrangement without a separate vehicle: joint control, unanimity, classification as a joint operation and party without joint control
- Case tasks documented here
- Do the decisions on the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control, and what is the combined share of those parties?
- Does Rivane have joint control? How does it account for its interest?
- Is the arrangement structured through a separate vehicle? What is its type?
Facts and data
InputsArrangement: parties, decision rules on the relevant activities, consent required
TextRequired
CONTRACT_BETWEEN_FOUR_PARTIES_CONSENT_OF_THREE_REQUIRED_FOR_RELEVANT_ACTIVITIES
Decision threshold set by the arrangement (%, case data)
Number
Combined share of the parties whose consent is required (%)
Number
90 %
Share of the parties without joint control (%)
Number
10 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
35 %
Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
30 %
Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
25 %
Separate vehicle: existence and legal form
Text
NO_COMPANY_CREATED_DEPOT_OWNED_BY_THE_PARTIES
Terms of the contractual arrangement on assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
Text
Other facts and circumstances: output, cash flows, enforceable rights
Text
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (arrangement, articles of the vehicle, offtake contracts)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the arrangement and its classification
AnalysisIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Points examined: arrangement and classification
ChecklistRequired
- Collective control of the arrangement assessed before looking for joint control
- Decisions on the relevant activities requiring the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control
- Parties taking part without joint control identified
- Existence of a separate vehicle established: without a separate vehicle, joint operation
- Legal form of the vehicle: a starting point, never sufficient on its own
- Contractual terms: confirm or change the rights suggested by the legal form
- Other facts and circumstances: rights to assets and obligations for liabilities
- Enforceable rights and legal or constructive obligations, not the design or intention of the parties
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 11
Cumulative share of the combination of parties (sum of the shares, %)
Calculation
90 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Judgments: joint control, vehicle and legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances
JudgmentIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Joint control of the arrangement
JudgmentRequired
Joint control
Joint control / No joint control / Not applicable
Professional judgment: joint control is supported by the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control; the decision threshold and the shares are data of the arrangement, never a percentage imposed by the standard.
Rationale: collective control, decisions and unanimous consent
Text
CONSENT_OF_THE_THREE_PARTIES_REQUIRED_FOR_RELEVANT_ACTIVITIES
Separate vehicle and legal form
JudgmentRequired
No separate vehicle
No separate vehicle / Separate vehicle / Not applicable
Rationale: structure and legal form
Text
NO_VEHICLE_SO_JOINT_OPERATION
Terms of the contractual arrangement
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form / The terms change the rights suggested by the form / Not applicable
Rationale: clauses read with the legal form
Text
Other facts and circumstances
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Enforceable rights to assets and obligations for liabilities / No such rights / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment looks at the existence of enforceable rights to assets and of legal or constructive obligations for liabilities, not at the purpose of the arrangement, the needs of the entity or its past practice.
Rationale: enforceability of the rights and obligations
Text
Classification retained
Choice
Joint operation
Joint operation / Joint venture / Not a joint arrangement
Items to document for the disclosures on the classification judgments
DisclosureIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14
Significant judgments to explain in the notes
Checklist
- Judgments that led to the conclusion of joint control
- Judgments on the type of arrangement when it is structured through a separate vehicle
Conclusion
ConclusionWhether an arrangement exists, the type retained (joint operation or joint venture) and the judgments that support it
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Arrangement describedPass
- Joint control judged and supportedPass
- Classification retainedPass
- Cumulative share recalculated = share retainedPass
- The combination reaches the decision threshold set by the arrangement (case data)Not evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Joint arrangement without a separate vehicle: joint control, unanimity, classification as a joint operation and party without joint control
- Case tasks documented here
- Do the decisions on the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control, and what is the combined share of those parties?
- Does Rivane have joint control? How does it account for its interest?
- Is the arrangement structured through a separate vehicle? What is its type?
Facts and data
InputsArrangement: parties, decision rules on the relevant activities, consent required
TextRequired
TEN_PERCENT_OF_CAPACITY_AND_COSTS_INFORMATION_AND_CONSULTATION_ONLY
Decision threshold set by the arrangement (%, case data)
Number
Combined share of the parties whose consent is required (%)
Number
Share of the parties without joint control (%)
Number
10 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Separate vehicle: existence and legal form
Text
Terms of the contractual arrangement on assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
Text
Other facts and circumstances: output, cash flows, enforceable rights
Text
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (arrangement, articles of the vehicle, offtake contracts)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the arrangement and its classification
AnalysisIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Points examined: arrangement and classification
ChecklistRequired
- Collective control of the arrangement assessed before looking for joint control
- Decisions on the relevant activities requiring the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control
- Parties taking part without joint control identified
- Existence of a separate vehicle established: without a separate vehicle, joint operation
- Legal form of the vehicle: a starting point, never sufficient on its own
- Contractual terms: confirm or change the rights suggested by the legal form
- Other facts and circumstances: rights to assets and obligations for liabilities
- Enforceable rights and legal or constructive obligations, not the design or intention of the parties
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 11
Cumulative share of the combination of parties (sum of the shares, %)
Calculation
0 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Judgments: joint control, vehicle and legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances
JudgmentIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Joint control of the arrangement
JudgmentRequired
No joint control
Joint control / No joint control / Not applicable
Professional judgment: joint control is supported by the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control; the decision threshold and the shares are data of the arrangement, never a percentage imposed by the standard.
Rationale: collective control, decisions and unanimous consent
Text
NO_RIGHT_OF_CONSENT_ON_RELEVANT_ACTIVITIES
Separate vehicle and legal form
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
No separate vehicle / Separate vehicle / Not applicable
Rationale: structure and legal form
Text
Terms of the contractual arrangement
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form / The terms change the rights suggested by the form / Not applicable
Rationale: clauses read with the legal form
Text
Other facts and circumstances
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Enforceable rights to assets and obligations for liabilities / No such rights / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment looks at the existence of enforceable rights to assets and of legal or constructive obligations for liabilities, not at the purpose of the arrangement, the needs of the entity or its past practice.
Rationale: enforceability of the rights and obligations
Text
Classification retained
Choice
Joint operation
Joint operation / Joint venture / Not a joint arrangement
Items to document for the disclosures on the classification judgments
DisclosureIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14
Significant judgments to explain in the notes
Checklist
- Judgments that led to the conclusion of joint control
- Judgments on the type of arrangement when it is structured through a separate vehicle
Conclusion
ConclusionWhether an arrangement exists, the type retained (joint operation or joint venture) and the judgments that support it
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Arrangement describedPass
- Joint control judged and supportedPass
- Classification retainedPass
- Cumulative share recalculated = share retainedNot evaluated
- The combination reaches the decision threshold set by the arrangement (case data)Not evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Joint arrangement with a separate vehicle: voting pattern, legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances and the 2015 Committee decision
- Case tasks documented here
- Hanvir: which combination of parties reaches the decision threshold, and which parties have joint control?
- Hanvir: does Mistel have joint control? Why is a single combination enough to conclude?
- Hanvir: what do the legal form and the terms of the agreement suggest about the rights of the parties?
- Hanvir: do the other facts and circumstances change the classification? Which type of arrangement results?
- Kelmar: joint control, legal form, terms and other facts and circumstances; which type of arrangement?
- Does the intention of Calder’s management or the purpose of Hanvir change the classification?
Facts and data
InputsArrangement: parties, decision rules on the relevant activities, consent required
TextRequired
SEVENTY_FIVE_PERCENT_DECISION_RULE_THREE_SHAREHOLDERS
Decision threshold set by the arrangement (%, case data)
Number
75 %
Combined share of the parties whose consent is required (%)
Number
80 %
Share of the parties without joint control (%)
Number
20 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
50 %
Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
30 %
Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Separate vehicle: existence and legal form
Text
JOINT_STOCK_COMPANY_LIMITED_LIABILITY
Terms of the contractual arrangement on assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
Text
LIABILITY_LIMITED_TO_CONTRIBUTION_NO_DIRECT_RIGHT_TO_ASSETS
Other facts and circumstances: output, cash flows, enforceable rights
Text
ENFORCEABLE_OFFTAKE_AT_COST_AND_LIABILITIES_SETTLED_BY_PARTY_PAYMENTS
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (arrangement, articles of the vehicle, offtake contracts)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the arrangement and its classification
AnalysisIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Points examined: arrangement and classification
ChecklistRequired
- Collective control of the arrangement assessed before looking for joint control
- Decisions on the relevant activities requiring the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control
- Parties taking part without joint control identified
- Existence of a separate vehicle established: without a separate vehicle, joint operation
- Legal form of the vehicle: a starting point, never sufficient on its own
- Contractual terms: confirm or change the rights suggested by the legal form
- Other facts and circumstances: rights to assets and obligations for liabilities
- Enforceable rights and legal or constructive obligations, not the design or intention of the parties
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 11
Cumulative share of the combination of parties (sum of the shares, %)
Calculation
80 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Judgments: joint control, vehicle and legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances
JudgmentIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Joint control of the arrangement
JudgmentRequired
Joint control
Joint control / No joint control / Not applicable
Professional judgment: joint control is supported by the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control; the decision threshold and the shares are data of the arrangement, never a percentage imposed by the standard.
Rationale: collective control, decisions and unanimous consent
Text
ONLY_THE_COMBINATION_OF_CALDER_AND_RUVANE_REACHES_THE_THRESHOLD
Separate vehicle and legal form
JudgmentRequired
Separate vehicle
No separate vehicle / Separate vehicle / Not applicable
Rationale: structure and legal form
Text
COMPANY_FORM_POINT_OF_DEPARTURE_ONLY
Terms of the contractual arrangement
JudgmentRequired
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form / The terms change the rights suggested by the form / Not applicable
Rationale: clauses read with the legal form
Text
AGREEMENT_LIMITS_LIABILITY_TO_THE_CONTRIBUTION
Other facts and circumstances
JudgmentRequired
Enforceable rights to assets and obligations for liabilities
Enforceable rights to assets and obligations for liabilities / No such rights / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment looks at the existence of enforceable rights to assets and of legal or constructive obligations for liabilities, not at the purpose of the arrangement, the needs of the entity or its past practice.
Rationale: enforceability of the rights and obligations
Text
ENFORCEABLE_COMMITMENTS_NOT_THE_INTENTION_OR_PURPOSE
Classification retained
Choice
Joint operation
Joint operation / Joint venture / Not a joint arrangement
Items to document for the disclosures on the classification judgments
DisclosureIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14
Significant judgments to explain in the notes
Checklist
- Judgments that led to the conclusion of joint control
- Judgments on the type of arrangement when it is structured through a separate vehicle
Conclusion
ConclusionWhether an arrangement exists, the type retained (joint operation or joint venture) and the judgments that support it
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Arrangement describedPass
- Joint control judged and supportedPass
- Classification retainedPass
- Cumulative share recalculated = share retainedPass
- The combination reaches the decision threshold set by the arrangement (case data)Pass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Joint arrangement with a separate vehicle: voting pattern, legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances and the 2015 Committee decision
- Case tasks documented here
- Hanvir: which combination of parties reaches the decision threshold, and which parties have joint control?
- Hanvir: does Mistel have joint control? Why is a single combination enough to conclude?
- Hanvir: what do the legal form and the terms of the agreement suggest about the rights of the parties?
- Hanvir: do the other facts and circumstances change the classification? Which type of arrangement results?
- Kelmar: joint control, legal form, terms and other facts and circumstances; which type of arrangement?
- Does the intention of Calder’s management or the purpose of Hanvir change the classification?
Facts and data
InputsArrangement: parties, decision rules on the relevant activities, consent required
TextRequired
UNANIMOUS_AGREEMENT_OF_THE_THREE_SHAREHOLDERS
Decision threshold set by the arrangement (%, case data)
Number
Combined share of the parties whose consent is required (%)
Number
Share of the parties without joint control (%)
Number
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Separate vehicle: existence and legal form
Text
SIMPLIFIED_JOINT_STOCK_COMPANY_LIMITED_LIABILITY
Terms of the contractual arrangement on assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
Text
Other facts and circumstances: output, cash flows, enforceable rights
Text
OUTPUT_SOLD_TO_THIRD_PARTIES_AT_MARKET_PRICE_NO_PARTY_GUARANTEE
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (arrangement, articles of the vehicle, offtake contracts)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the arrangement and its classification
AnalysisIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Points examined: arrangement and classification
ChecklistRequired
- Collective control of the arrangement assessed before looking for joint control
- Decisions on the relevant activities requiring the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control
- Parties taking part without joint control identified
- Existence of a separate vehicle established: without a separate vehicle, joint operation
- Legal form of the vehicle: a starting point, never sufficient on its own
- Contractual terms: confirm or change the rights suggested by the legal form
- Other facts and circumstances: rights to assets and obligations for liabilities
- Enforceable rights and legal or constructive obligations, not the design or intention of the parties
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 11
Cumulative share of the combination of parties (sum of the shares, %)
Calculation
0 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Judgments: joint control, vehicle and legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances
JudgmentIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Joint control of the arrangement
JudgmentRequired
Joint control
Joint control / No joint control / Not applicable
Professional judgment: joint control is supported by the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control; the decision threshold and the shares are data of the arrangement, never a percentage imposed by the standard.
Rationale: collective control, decisions and unanimous consent
Text
ANY_DECISION_REQUIRES_THE_THREE_SHAREHOLDERS
Separate vehicle and legal form
JudgmentRequired
Separate vehicle
No separate vehicle / Separate vehicle / Not applicable
Rationale: structure and legal form
Text
COMPANY_FORM_SUGGESTS_RIGHTS_TO_NET_ASSETS
Terms of the contractual arrangement
JudgmentRequired
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form / The terms change the rights suggested by the form / Not applicable
Rationale: clauses read with the legal form
Text
NO_DIRECT_RIGHT_TO_ASSETS
Other facts and circumstances
JudgmentRequired
No such rights
Enforceable rights to assets and obligations for liabilities / No such rights / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment looks at the existence of enforceable rights to assets and of legal or constructive obligations for liabilities, not at the purpose of the arrangement, the needs of the entity or its past practice.
Rationale: enforceability of the rights and obligations
Text
NO_PURCHASE_COMMITMENT_AND_NO_GUARANTEE_OF_LIABILITIES
Classification retained
Choice
Joint venture
Joint operation / Joint venture / Not a joint arrangement
Items to document for the disclosures on the classification judgments
DisclosureIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14
Significant judgments to explain in the notes
Checklist
- Judgments that led to the conclusion of joint control
- Judgments on the type of arrangement when it is structured through a separate vehicle
Conclusion
ConclusionWhether an arrangement exists, the type retained (joint operation or joint venture) and the judgments that support it
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Arrangement describedPass
- Joint control judged and supportedPass
- Classification retainedPass
- Cumulative share recalculated = share retainedNot evaluated
- The combination reaches the decision threshold set by the arrangement (case data)Not evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Joint arrangement file: joint control, classification, accounting of the joint operator or joint venturer and separate financial statements (IFRS 11)
- Case tasks documented here
- Marlaix: which parties have joint control, and what is their combined share?
- Marlaix: is there a separate vehicle, and what is the type of arrangement?
- Hestial: what do the legal form and the terms of the agreement suggest?
- Hestial: do the other facts and circumstances, in view of the legal opinion, change the classification?
Facts and data
InputsArrangement: parties, decision rules on the relevant activities, consent required
TextRequired
DEPOT_BY_CONTRACT_CONSENT_OF_THREE_OF_FOUR_PARTIES_REQUIRED
Decision threshold set by the arrangement (%, case data)
Number
Combined share of the parties whose consent is required (%)
Number
90 %
Share of the parties without joint control (%)
Number
10 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
40 %
Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
30 %
Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
20 %
Separate vehicle: existence and legal form
Text
NO_COMPANY_DEPOT_OWNED_BY_THE_PARTIES
Terms of the contractual arrangement on assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
Text
Other facts and circumstances: output, cash flows, enforceable rights
Text
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (arrangement, articles of the vehicle, offtake contracts)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the arrangement and its classification
AnalysisIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Points examined: arrangement and classification
ChecklistRequired
- Collective control of the arrangement assessed before looking for joint control
- Decisions on the relevant activities requiring the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control
- Parties taking part without joint control identified
- Existence of a separate vehicle established: without a separate vehicle, joint operation
- Legal form of the vehicle: a starting point, never sufficient on its own
- Contractual terms: confirm or change the rights suggested by the legal form
- Other facts and circumstances: rights to assets and obligations for liabilities
- Enforceable rights and legal or constructive obligations, not the design or intention of the parties
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 11
Cumulative share of the combination of parties (sum of the shares, %)
Calculation
90 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Judgments: joint control, vehicle and legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances
JudgmentIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Joint control of the arrangement
JudgmentRequired
Joint control
Joint control / No joint control / Not applicable
Professional judgment: joint control is supported by the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control; the decision threshold and the shares are data of the arrangement, never a percentage imposed by the standard.
Rationale: collective control, decisions and unanimous consent
Text
CONSENT_OF_VERLANCE_PELMAR_AND_DORINE_REQUIRED
Separate vehicle and legal form
JudgmentRequired
No separate vehicle
No separate vehicle / Separate vehicle / Not applicable
Rationale: structure and legal form
Text
NO_VEHICLE_SO_JOINT_OPERATION
Terms of the contractual arrangement
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form / The terms change the rights suggested by the form / Not applicable
Rationale: clauses read with the legal form
Text
Other facts and circumstances
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Enforceable rights to assets and obligations for liabilities / No such rights / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment looks at the existence of enforceable rights to assets and of legal or constructive obligations for liabilities, not at the purpose of the arrangement, the needs of the entity or its past practice.
Rationale: enforceability of the rights and obligations
Text
Classification retained
Choice
Joint operation
Joint operation / Joint venture / Not a joint arrangement
Items to document for the disclosures on the classification judgments
DisclosureIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14
Significant judgments to explain in the notes
Checklist
- Judgments that led to the conclusion of joint control
- Judgments on the type of arrangement when it is structured through a separate vehicle
Conclusion
ConclusionWhether an arrangement exists, the type retained (joint operation or joint venture) and the judgments that support it
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Arrangement describedPass
- Joint control judged and supportedPass
- Classification retainedPass
- Cumulative share recalculated = share retainedPass
- The combination reaches the decision threshold set by the arrangement (case data)Not evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Joint arrangement file: joint control, classification, accounting of the joint operator or joint venturer and separate financial statements (IFRS 11)
- Case tasks documented here
- Marlaix: which parties have joint control, and what is their combined share?
- Marlaix: is there a separate vehicle, and what is the type of arrangement?
- Hestial: what do the legal form and the terms of the agreement suggest?
- Hestial: do the other facts and circumstances, in view of the legal opinion, change the classification?
Facts and data
InputsArrangement: parties, decision rules on the relevant activities, consent required
TextRequired
TWO_SHAREHOLDERS_DECIDING_TOGETHER
Decision threshold set by the arrangement (%, case data)
Number
Combined share of the parties whose consent is required (%)
Number
Share of the parties without joint control (%)
Number
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Separate vehicle: existence and legal form
Text
JOINT_STOCK_COMPANY_LIMITED_LIABILITY
Terms of the contractual arrangement on assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
Text
LIABILITY_LIMITED_TO_THE_CONTRIBUTION
Other facts and circumstances: output, cash flows, enforceable rights
Text
ENFORCEABLE_OFFTAKE_AT_COST_CONFIRMED_BY_LEGAL_OPINION
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (arrangement, articles of the vehicle, offtake contracts)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the arrangement and its classification
AnalysisIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Points examined: arrangement and classification
ChecklistRequired
- Collective control of the arrangement assessed before looking for joint control
- Decisions on the relevant activities requiring the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control
- Parties taking part without joint control identified
- Existence of a separate vehicle established: without a separate vehicle, joint operation
- Legal form of the vehicle: a starting point, never sufficient on its own
- Contractual terms: confirm or change the rights suggested by the legal form
- Other facts and circumstances: rights to assets and obligations for liabilities
- Enforceable rights and legal or constructive obligations, not the design or intention of the parties
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 11
Cumulative share of the combination of parties (sum of the shares, %)
Calculation
0 %
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Judgments: joint control, vehicle and legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances
JudgmentIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Joint control of the arrangement
JudgmentRequired
Joint control
Joint control / No joint control / Not applicable
Professional judgment: joint control is supported by the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control; the decision threshold and the shares are data of the arrangement, never a percentage imposed by the standard.
Rationale: collective control, decisions and unanimous consent
Text
THE_TWO_SHAREHOLDERS_DECIDE_TOGETHER
Separate vehicle and legal form
JudgmentRequired
Separate vehicle
No separate vehicle / Separate vehicle / Not applicable
Rationale: structure and legal form
Text
COMPANY_FORM_POINT_OF_DEPARTURE_ONLY
Terms of the contractual arrangement
JudgmentRequired
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form / The terms change the rights suggested by the form / Not applicable
Rationale: clauses read with the legal form
Text
AGREEMENT_LIMITS_LIABILITY_TO_THE_CONTRIBUTION
Other facts and circumstances
JudgmentRequired
Enforceable rights to assets and obligations for liabilities
Enforceable rights to assets and obligations for liabilities / No such rights / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment looks at the existence of enforceable rights to assets and of legal or constructive obligations for liabilities, not at the purpose of the arrangement, the needs of the entity or its past practice.
Rationale: enforceability of the rights and obligations
Text
ENFORCEABLE_COMMITMENTS_AND_LIABILITIES_SETTLED_BY_PARTY_PAYMENTS
Classification retained
Choice
Joint operation
Joint operation / Joint venture / Not a joint arrangement
Items to document for the disclosures on the classification judgments
DisclosureIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14
Significant judgments to explain in the notes
Checklist
- Judgments that led to the conclusion of joint control
- Judgments on the type of arrangement when it is structured through a separate vehicle
Conclusion
ConclusionWhether an arrangement exists, the type retained (joint operation or joint venture) and the judgments that support it
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Arrangement describedPass
- Joint control judged and supportedPass
- Classification retainedPass
- Cumulative share recalculated = share retainedNot evaluated
- The combination reaches the decision threshold set by the arrangement (case data)Not evaluated
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
Facts and data
InputsArrangement: parties, decision rules on the relevant activities, consent required
TextRequired
Decision threshold set by the arrangement (%, case data)
Number
Combined share of the parties whose consent is required (%)
Number
Share of the parties without joint control (%)
Number
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Number
Separate vehicle: existence and legal form
Text
Terms of the contractual arrangement on assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
Text
Other facts and circumstances: output, cash flows, enforceable rights
Text
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (arrangement, articles of the vehicle, offtake contracts)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the arrangement and its classification
AnalysisIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Points examined: arrangement and classification
ChecklistRequired
- Collective control of the arrangement assessed before looking for joint control
- Decisions on the relevant activities requiring the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control
- Parties taking part without joint control identified
- Existence of a separate vehicle established: without a separate vehicle, joint operation
- Legal form of the vehicle: a starting point, never sufficient on its own
- Contractual terms: confirm or change the rights suggested by the legal form
- Other facts and circumstances: rights to assets and obligations for liabilities
- Enforceable rights and legal or constructive obligations, not the design or intention of the parties
Calculations
CalculationsIFRS 11
Cumulative share of the combination of parties (sum of the shares, %)
Calculation
Share of party 1 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 2 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%) ; Share of party 3 of the combination whose unanimous consent is required (%)
Judgments: joint control, vehicle and legal form, contractual terms, other facts and circumstances
JudgmentIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14IFRS 11 §B16IFRS 11 §B30IFRS 11
Joint control of the arrangement
JudgmentRequired
Joint control / No joint control / Not applicable
Professional judgment: joint control is supported by the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control; the decision threshold and the shares are data of the arrangement, never a percentage imposed by the standard.
Rationale: collective control, decisions and unanimous consent
Text
Separate vehicle and legal form
JudgmentRequired
No separate vehicle / Separate vehicle / Not applicable
Rationale: structure and legal form
Text
Terms of the contractual arrangement
JudgmentRequired
The terms confirm the rights suggested by the form / The terms change the rights suggested by the form / Not applicable
Rationale: clauses read with the legal form
Text
Other facts and circumstances
JudgmentRequired
Enforceable rights to assets and obligations for liabilities / No such rights / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment looks at the existence of enforceable rights to assets and of legal or constructive obligations for liabilities, not at the purpose of the arrangement, the needs of the entity or its past practice.
Rationale: enforceability of the rights and obligations
Text
Classification retained
Choice
Joint operation / Joint venture / Not a joint arrangement
Items to document for the disclosures on the classification judgments
DisclosureIFRS 11IFRS 11 §14
Significant judgments to explain in the notes
Checklist
- Judgments that led to the conclusion of joint control
- Judgments on the type of arrangement when it is structured through a separate vehicle
Conclusion
ConclusionWhether an arrangement exists, the type retained (joint operation or joint venture) and the judgments that support it
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References