IFRS 2 · Workpapers (Step 4 of 5)
Workpaper template
- Course
- Exercises
- Case studies
- Workpapers
- Exams
Share-based award: settlement method, grant date, classification of the conditions and settlement alternative
- Prepared by
- AI-assisted draft
- Reviewed by
- Not reviewed — human review required
- Status
- Published
Objective of the workpaper
Record the terms of the award, the approvals and the dates, the conditions of the plan and, where the entity or the counterparty can choose the settlement method, the settlement practice of the entity. Classify the settlement method, fix the grant date, classify each condition (service, non-market performance, market, non-vesting) and, for a settlement alternative at the choice of the entity, assess whether it has a present obligation to settle in cash. The terms, the dates and the amounts are case data; each classification remains a supported judgment.
7 sections · 21 blocks · 0 calculations · 0 entries
- IFRS 2 §2
- IFRS 2 §30
- IFRS 2
- IFRS 2
- IFRS 2 §19
- IFRS 2 §21
- IFRS 2 §21A
- IFRS 2 §34
- IFRS 2 §41
Work this workpaper as a mission
Each case that uses this template opens in the mission workspace: data, analysis, calculation, entries, conclusion and review, with your progress saved.
- Share-linked plans: settlement method, grant date and first expenseOpen the mission · Plan A — share options
- Share-linked plans: settlement method, grant date and first expenseOpen the mission · Bonus B linked to the share price
- Settlement alternatives, group plans, tax withholding, deferred tax and replacement awards: one group, eight situationsOpen the mission · Plan K — chief financial officer's choice
- Settlement alternatives, group plans, tax withholding, deferred tax and replacement awards: one group, eight situationsOpen the mission · Plan L1
- Settlement alternatives, group plans, tax withholding, deferred tax and replacement awards: one group, eight situationsOpen the mission · Plan L2
- Settlement alternatives, group plans, tax withholding, deferred tax and replacement awards: one group, eight situationsOpen the mission · Plan M — employees of the subsidiary
- File on a share-based payment plan: classification, measurement, expense of the period, modifications and disclosures (IFRS 2)Open the mission · Plan 1 — options
- File on a share-based payment plan: classification, measurement, expense of the period, modifications and disclosures (IFRS 2)Open the mission · Plan 1 — revenue target
- File on a share-based payment plan: classification, measurement, expense of the period, modifications and disclosures (IFRS 2)Open the mission · Plan 2 — share appreciation rights
9 instances from the cases: the calculations and entries below are run by the calculation engine.
- File and entity
- Share-linked plans: settlement method, grant date and first expense
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify the settlement method of plan A and of bonus B.
- Determine the grant date of plan A.
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
OPTIONS_TO_SUBSCRIBE_NEW_SHARES_FOR_200_EMPLOYEES_PAID_IN_SHARES
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
BOARD_APPROVAL_THEN_TERMS_COMMUNICATED_THEN_SHAREHOLDER_APPROVAL_REQUIRED_AND_OBTAINED_ON_20_MARCH_20X6
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
EMPLOYED_ON_31_DECEMBER_20X8_AND_THREE_OTHER_CONDITIONS_NOT_ASSESSED_IN_THIS_CASE
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
NO_CHOICE_OF_SETTLEMENT_NEW_SHARES_ISSUED_ON_EXERCISE
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
20,000 units
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
8
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Equity-settled
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
NEW_SHARES_ARE_ISSUED_IF_THE_OPTIONS_ARE_EXERCISED
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
TERMS_AGREED_AND_SHAREHOLDER_APPROVAL_OBTAINED_ON_20_MARCH_20X6
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Terms of the award describedPass
- Approvals and dates describedPass
- Conditions of the plan describedPass
- Settlement method judged and supportedPass
- Grant date judged and supportedPass
- Type of condition judged and supportedPass
- Present obligation judged or ruled outPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Share-linked plans: settlement method, grant date and first expense
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify the settlement method of plan A and of bonus B.
- Determine the grant date of plan A.
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
CASH_PAYMENT_OF_THE_EXCESS_OF_THE_SHARE_PRICE_OVER_15_EUR_FOR_10000_RIGHTS
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
NOT_ASSESSED_IN_THIS_CASE
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
NO_CONDITION_DESCRIBED
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
CASH_PAYMENT_AMOUNT_DEPENDS_ON_THE_SHARE_PRICE
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
10,000 units
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Cash-settled
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
CASH_PAID_WHOSE_AMOUNT_DEPENDS_ON_THE_PRICE_OF_THE_ENTITY_SHARE
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Terms of the award describedPass
- Approvals and dates describedPass
- Conditions of the plan describedPass
- Settlement method judged and supportedPass
- Grant date judged and supportedPass
- Type of condition judged and supportedPass
- Present obligation judged or ruled outPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Settlement alternatives, group plans, tax withholding, deferred tax and replacement awards: one group, eight situations
- Case tasks documented here
- Plan K: how is the award accounted for, and what is the fair value of each alternative?
- Plans L1 and L2: does Hesperia have a present obligation to settle in cash? How is each plan classified?
- Plan M: how does the subsidiary account for it in its separate financial statements?
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
CFO_CAN_CHOOSE_2000_SHARES_OR_CASH_EQUAL_TO_THE_VALUE_OF_1800_SHARES
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
SERVICES_FULLY_RENDERED_IN_20X6
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
SERVICE_COMPLETED_IN_20X6
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
THE_COUNTERPARTY_CHOOSES_THE_SETTLEMENT_METHOD
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
48,000
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
COMPOUND_INSTRUMENT_WITH_A_LIABILITY_COMPONENT_AND_AN_EQUITY_COMPONENT
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Terms of the award describedPass
- Approvals and dates describedPass
- Conditions of the plan describedPass
- Settlement method judged and supportedPass
- Grant date judged and supportedPass
- Type of condition judged and supportedPass
- Present obligation judged or ruled outPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Settlement alternatives, group plans, tax withholding, deferred tax and replacement awards: one group, eight situations
- Case tasks documented here
- Plan K: how is the award accounted for, and what is the fair value of each alternative?
- Plans L1 and L2: does Hesperia have a present obligation to settle in cash? How is each plan classified?
- Plan M: how does the subsidiary account for it in its separate financial statements?
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
ENTITY_MAY_DELIVER_SHARES_OR_PAY_CASH
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
APPROVALS_OBTAINED_IN_20X6
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
SERVICE_CONDITION
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
NO_CASH_SETTLEMENT_IN_THE_PAST_NO_COMMITMENT_AND_NO_ANNOUNCED_POLICY
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
30,000
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Equity-settled
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
NO_PRESENT_OBLIGATION_TO_SETTLE_IN_CASH_SO_THE_PLAN_IS_EQUITY_SETTLED
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
No present obligation to settle in cash
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
NO_PAST_PRACTICE_AND_NO_COMMITMENT_OF_THE_BOARD
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Terms of the award describedPass
- Approvals and dates describedPass
- Conditions of the plan describedPass
- Settlement method judged and supportedPass
- Grant date judged and supportedPass
- Type of condition judged and supportedPass
- Present obligation judged or ruled outPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Settlement alternatives, group plans, tax withholding, deferred tax and replacement awards: one group, eight situations
- Case tasks documented here
- Plan K: how is the award accounted for, and what is the fair value of each alternative?
- Plans L1 and L2: does Hesperia have a present obligation to settle in cash? How is each plan classified?
- Plan M: how does the subsidiary account for it in its separate financial statements?
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
ENTITY_MAY_DELIVER_SHARES_OR_PAY_CASH
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
APPROVALS_OBTAINED_IN_20X6
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
SERVICE_CONDITION
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
THE_LAST_THREE_PLANS_WERE_SETTLED_IN_CASH_AND_THE_BOARD_ANNOUNCED_IT_WOULD_CONTINUE
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
60,000
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Cash-settled
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
PRESENT_OBLIGATION_TO_SETTLE_IN_CASH_SO_THE_PLAN_IS_CASH_SETTLED
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
Present obligation to settle in cash
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
CONSISTENT_CASH_SETTLEMENT_PRACTICE_AND_ANNOUNCED_POLICY
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Terms of the award describedPass
- Approvals and dates describedPass
- Conditions of the plan describedPass
- Settlement method judged and supportedPass
- Grant date judged and supportedPass
- Type of condition judged and supportedPass
- Present obligation judged or ruled outPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Settlement alternatives, group plans, tax withholding, deferred tax and replacement awards: one group, eight situations
- Case tasks documented here
- Plan K: how is the award accounted for, and what is the fair value of each alternative?
- Plans L1 and L2: does Hesperia have a present obligation to settle in cash? How is each plan classified?
- Plan M: how does the subsidiary account for it in its separate financial statements?
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
PARENT_SHARES_GRANTED_DIRECTLY_TO_EMPLOYEES_OF_THE_SUBSIDIARY
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
APPROVALS_OBTAINED_IN_20X6
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
SERVICE_CONDITION
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
THE_PARENT_DELIVERS_THE_SHARES_THE_SUBSIDIARY_HAS_NO_OBLIGATION
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Equity-settled
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
THE_PARENT_HAS_THE_OBLIGATION_TO_DELIVER_SO_THE_SUBSIDIARY_RECORDS_AN_EQUITY_SETTLED_AWARD
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Terms of the award describedPass
- Approvals and dates describedPass
- Conditions of the plan describedPass
- Settlement method judged and supportedPass
- Grant date judged and supportedPass
- Type of condition judged and supportedPass
- Present obligation judged or ruled outPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- File on a share-based payment plan: classification, measurement, expense of the period, modifications and disclosures (IFRS 2)
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify the settlement method of each plan.
- Fix the grant date of plan 2.
- Classify the conditions of plans 1 and 2.
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
OPTIONS_FOR_60_MANAGERS_SETTLED_IN_NEW_SHARES
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
ALL_APPROVALS_OBTAINED_ON_1_JANUARY_20X6
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
EMPLOYED_UNTIL_31_DECEMBER_20X9
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
30,000 units
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
8
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Equity-settled
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
NEW_SHARES_ARE_ISSUED_ON_EXERCISE
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
AGREEMENT_AND_APPROVALS_COMPLETE_ON_1_JANUARY_20X6
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Service condition
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
REQUIRES_THE_MANAGER_TO_STAY_UNTIL_THE_END_OF_THE_VESTING_PERIOD
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Terms of the award describedPass
- Approvals and dates describedPass
- Conditions of the plan describedPass
- Settlement method judged and supportedPass
- Grant date judged and supportedPass
- Type of condition judged and supportedPass
- Present obligation judged or ruled outPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- File on a share-based payment plan: classification, measurement, expense of the period, modifications and disclosures (IFRS 2)
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify the settlement method of each plan.
- Fix the grant date of plan 2.
- Classify the conditions of plans 1 and 2.
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
OPTIONS_FOR_60_MANAGERS_SETTLED_IN_NEW_SHARES
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
ALL_APPROVALS_OBTAINED_ON_1_JANUARY_20X6
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
CUMULATIVE_REVENUE_REACHES_THE_TARGET_OF_THE_PLAN
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Non-market performance condition
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
RELATES_TO_THE_ACTIVITY_OF_THE_ENTITY_SO_IT_ACTS_ON_THE_NUMBER_OF_OPTIONS
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Terms of the award describedPass
- Approvals and dates describedPass
- Conditions of the plan describedPass
- Settlement method judged and supportedPass
- Grant date judged and supportedPass
- Type of condition judged and supportedPass
- Present obligation judged or ruled outPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- File on a share-based payment plan: classification, measurement, expense of the period, modifications and disclosures (IFRS 2)
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify the settlement method of each plan.
- Fix the grant date of plan 2.
- Classify the conditions of plans 1 and 2.
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
SHARE_APPRECIATION_RIGHTS_FOR_40_EXECUTIVES_PAID_IN_CASH
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
APPROVED_BY_THE_COMMITTEE_ON_20_DECEMBER_20X6_AND_ACCEPTED_BY_THE_EXECUTIVES_ON_10_JANUARY_20X7
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
EMPLOYED_UNTIL_31_DECEMBER_20X8_AND_TARGET_PRICE_REACHED
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
4,000 units
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Cash-settled
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
CASH_PAID_WHOSE_AMOUNT_DEPENDS_ON_THE_SHARE_PRICE
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
AGREEMENT_OF_THE_EXECUTIVES_ON_10_JANUARY_20X7_AFTER_THE_COMMITTEE_APPROVAL
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Market condition
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
THE_TARGET_PRICE_IS_A_MARKET_CONDITION_ALREADY_IN_THE_FAIR_VALUE_OF_THE_RIGHT
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Terms of the award describedPass
- Approvals and dates describedPass
- Conditions of the plan describedPass
- Settlement method judged and supportedPass
- Grant date judged and supportedPass
- Type of condition judged and supportedPass
- Present obligation judged or ruled outPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
Facts and data
InputsTerms of the award: beneficiaries, instruments, exercise price, planned settlement method
TextRequired
Approvals required, date of agreement on the terms and start of the services
TextRequired
Conditions of the plan: service, performance, share price, other conditions
TextRequired
Settlement practice of the entity and any choice of the counterparty or of the entity
Text
Number of instruments granted (case data)
Number
Unit fair value at the grant date (case data)
Number
Total fair value of the award or of the alternative examined (case data)
Number
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (plan rules, approval minutes, communication to the beneficiaries)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the settlement method, the grant date and the conditions
AnalysisIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Points examined: settlement method and grant date
ChecklistRequired
- Consideration: equity instruments of the entity, or a liability based on their price, or a choice between the two
- Agreement of the entity and the counterparty on the terms, with a shared understanding
- All the necessary approvals obtained (shareholders, board)
- Services started before the grant date: fair value estimated for the earlier period
- Cash payment unrelated to the share price: employee benefit outside IFRS 2
Points examined: conditions
ChecklistRequired
- Service and non-market performance conditions: taken into account in the number of instruments expected to vest
- Market condition (target price): taken into account in the fair value, expense recognised whether or not the condition is met
- Non-vesting condition: taken into account in the grant-date fair value
- Each condition classified separately from its terms, not from its name
Judgments: settlement method, grant date, type of condition and present obligation
JudgmentIFRS 2 §2IFRS 2 §30IFRS 2IFRS 2IFRS 2 §19IFRS 2 §21IFRS 2 §21AIFRS 2 §34IFRS 2 §41IFRS 2
Settlement method of the award
JudgmentRequired
Equity-settled / Cash-settled / Settlement alternative at the choice of the counterparty / Settlement alternative at the choice of the entity / Outside the scope of IFRS 2 / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the classification is supported by the terms of the award and by the rights and obligations of the entity; the name of the plan is not enough.
Rationale: nature of the consideration, rights and obligations of the entity
Text
Grant date
JudgmentRequired
Grant date reached: agreement on the terms and approvals obtained / Grant date not reached: a necessary approval is missing / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the grant date is when the agreement on the terms and all the necessary approvals are in place, not the date of the first communication.
Rationale: dates of agreement, approval and start of the services
Text
Type of the condition examined
JudgmentRequired
Service condition / Non-market performance condition / Market condition / Non-vesting condition / Not applicable
Professional judgment: a condition is classified from what it requires of the counterparty and of the entity; its treatment (number of instruments or fair value) follows.
Rationale: link with the service, the performance of the entity or the share price, and the resulting treatment
Text
Present obligation to settle in cash (alternative at the choice of the entity)
JudgmentRequired
Present obligation to settle in cash / No present obligation to settle in cash / Not applicable
Professional judgment: the assessment concerns the existence of a present obligation, whether or not the choice depends on the share price; it is supported by the facts of the case.
Rationale: past settlement practice, commitments made and announced policy
Text
Items to document for the disclosures
DisclosureIFRS 2 §2
Information to prepare on the arrangements classified
Checklist
- Description of each arrangement: beneficiaries, vesting conditions, maximum term, settlement method
- Significant judgments that led to the classification
Conclusion
ConclusionSettlement method retained, grant date, type of each condition and conclusion on the present obligation, with the decisive terms
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References