CoreIntermediate · Advanced · Expert
Retrospective application: opening equity and comparatives
Learning objectives
- Calculate the adjustment to opening equity of the earliest prior period presented and the restated comparative amounts.L2, L3
- Record the retrospective adjustment for a change in accounting policy, including the tax effect.L2, L3
- Prepare the restatement table (as previously reported, adjustment, restated) by line item and by period.L3, L4
- Identify an error in carrying out the restatement (adjustment recognised in profit or loss of the period, comparatives not restated).L2, L3
Normative references
- IAS 8 §4The tax effects of corrections of prior period errors and of retrospective adjustments made to apply changes in accounting policies are accounted for and disclosed in accordance with IAS 12.
- IAS 8 §5Definitions: accounting policies — the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied by an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements; accounting estimates — monetary amounts in financial statements that are subject to measurement uncertainty; 'material' — used as defined in IAS 1 (para. 7); prior period errors — omissions from, and misstatements in, the financial statements for one or more prior periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of, reliable information that was available when those financial statements were authorised for issue and could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account (mathematical mistakes, mistakes in applying accounting policies, oversights, misinterpretations of facts, fraud); retrospective application — applying a new accounting policy as if that policy had always been applied; retrospective restatement — correcting the recognition, measurement and disclosure of amounts as if the error had never occurred; prospective application — applying a new policy to transactions occurring after the date of the change, and recognising the effect of a change in estimate in the current and future periods affected; impracticable — a requirement the entity cannot apply after making every reasonable effort to do so, which, for a prior period, covers three situations: effects not determinable; assumptions required about what management's intent would have been at the time; significant estimates for which it is impossible to distinguish objectively information that provides evidence of circumstances that existed at that date and that would have been available when the financial statements were authorised for issue.
- IAS 8 §22Subject to para. 23, retrospective application means adjusting the opening balance of each affected component of equity for the earliest prior period presented, and the other comparative amounts for each prior period presented, as if the new accounting policy had always been applied.
- IAS 8Under retrospective application, the new accounting policy is applied to comparative information for prior periods as far back as is practicable; the adjustment relating to periods before those presented is made to the opening balance of each affected component of equity of the earliest prior period presented, usually retained earnings.
Original summaries of the paragraphs (reference register), never a quotation of the standard.
30 questions
- Zétine applies a new inventory cost policy retrospectively: opening inventories of the earliest period presented increase by {inventory_adjustment}. The tax base does not change and the tax rate is {tax_rate} (case data). Record the entries adjusting the opening balances.L2
- Plirgois voluntarily moves to a cost formula that values its inventories higher: by {opening_difference} at the beginning of the comparative year and by {closing_difference} at its end. By how much does restated comparative profit before tax increase?L3
- What does an entity actually do when it applies a new accounting policy retrospectively?L2
- Keundade voluntarily changes a policy in 2025 and presents 2025 and 2024. At what date does it adjust opening equity?L2
- Morgorn, subject to local regulation, presents three years (2025, 2024, 2023) and voluntarily changes a policy in 2025. Which equity balance is adjusted?L3
- Rurnard's change in policy affects both retained earnings and another component of equity. What does IAS 8 require for the opening of the earliest period presented?L3
- Laurvorn changes policy in 2025 and presents 2025 and 2024. The new policy would have increased profit before tax by {effect_2022} in 2022 and by {effect_2023} in 2023 (tax effect ignored, case assumption). What adjustment should be made to equity at 1 January 2024?L2
- Lelvade's published 2024 cost of sales amounts to {published_cost_of_sales}. Applied to 2024, the new policy adopted in 2025 would have reduced it by {decrease}. What 2024 cost of sales should be presented as the comparative?L2
- At 1 January 2024, the opening of the earliest period presented, Stainine's published retained earnings amount to {published_opening_re}. The cumulative pre-tax effect of the new policy on prior years is an increase of {pre_tax_effect}; deferred tax rate of {tax_rate} (case data). Compute restated opening retained earnings.L3
- After restatement, Stomence's retained earnings at 1 January 2024 amount to {restated_opening_re}. Published 2024 profit is {published_profit_2024}; the new policy increases it by {pre_tax_effect_2024} before tax (rate of {tax_rate}, case data). Dividends of {dividends_2024} were paid in 2024. Compute restated 2024 profit and restated retained earnings at 31 December 2024.L3
- The pre-tax effects of a new policy adopted in 2025 by Flinade would have been a decrease in profit of {effect_2021} in 2021, {effect_2022} in 2022 and {effect_2023} in 2023. Flinade presents 2025 and 2024 (tax effect ignored, case assumption). What decrease should be made to opening equity of the earliest period presented?L2
- Taimenne presents 2025 and 2024. Its inventories are worth, under the old and the new policy: {old_opening} and {new_opening} at 1 January 2024; {old_closing} and {new_closing} at 31 December 2024 (tax effect ignored, case assumption). Compute the adjustment to opening equity and the increase in restated 2024 profit.L3
- Kymorn's new policy increases a provision. Provision amounts under the old and new policy: {old_opening} and {new_opening} at 1 January 2024, {old_closing} and {new_closing} at 31 December 2024. Kymorn presents 2025 and 2024 (tax effect ignored). What decreases should be used for opening equity and for 2024 profit?L3
- Paulouël's restatement table (comparative year 2024, published amounts): inventories at 31 December {published_inventory}, retained earnings at 31 December {published_re}, profit {published_profit}. The new policy increases inventories by {opening_difference} at 1 January 2024 and by {closing_difference} at 31 December 2024; deferred tax rate {tax_rate} (case data). Compute the three restated amounts.L4
- For Neulbax (presenting 2025 and 2024), the new policy would have increased equity by {effect_before_2024} for years before 2024 and 2024 profit by {effect_2024} (tax effect ignored). Compute the adjustment to equity at 1 January 2024 and the total equity difference at 1 January 2025 between the two policies.L3
- Jeulbence's published deferred tax liability at 31 December 2024 is {published_dtl}. The new policy, applied retrospectively, increases inventories at that date by {inventory_increase}, without changing their tax base; rate of {tax_rate} (case data). What deferred tax liability should be presented as the comparative?L2
- Pyrgouël voluntarily changes a policy in 2025; the cumulative effect on prior years is a gain of 70,000. The accountant records it in 2025 profit as 'exceptional income'. What is the error?L2
- Rirenne applies a new policy retrospectively: it adjusts equity at 1 January 2024 but presents the 2024 income statement as originally published. What is the error?L2
- Sailard, which presents 2025 and 2024, changes policy in 2025. It charges the effect of years before 2025 to equity at 1 January 2025 and leaves the 2024 balance sheet and profit unchanged. What is the error?L3
- In Stescade's restatement table, the new policy changes 2024 closing inventories, but the 2024 cost of sales presented as comparative is the published one. What inconsistency do you note?L3
- Tergot voluntarily changes its cost formula; its inventories at 1 January 2024, the opening of the earliest period presented, increase by {inventory_increase}. The tax effect is dealt with separately (outside this question). Record the opening adjustment entry.L2
- For Grélal, retrospective application of a new policy for including production overheads increases inventories at 1 January 2024 by {inventory_increase}. The tax base of inventories does not change; rate of {tax_rate} (case data). Record the opening entries, including the tax effect.L3
- Chovore's new policy leads to recognising, at 1 January 2024 (opening of the earliest period presented), a liability of {liability_increase} that was not recognised under the old policy. The expense will be deductible when paid, at a rate of {tax_rate}, and the deferred tax asset is recoverable (case data). Record the opening entries.L3
- Under Vrostède's new policy, the expense of the comparative year 2024 would have been higher by {expense_2024}, with a liability at 31 December 2024 as the other side. The tax effect is dealt with separately. Record the entry restating the 2024 comparative.L3
- Mérnane: the new policy increases inventories by {opening_difference} at 1 January 2024 and reduces 2024 cost of sales by {effect_2024}. Tax effect outside the question. Record the entries restating the opening balance and the 2024 comparative.L3
- The new cost formula adopted by Kailbian reduces inventories at 1 January 2024, the opening of the earliest period presented, by {inventory_decrease}. The tax base does not change; rate of {tax_rate}; the deferred tax asset is recoverable (case data). Record the entries.L2
- Zeumard, which presents 2025 and 2024, voluntarily adopts a new policy in 2025. Its controller proposes three treatments. Which should be used?L2
- The Vraiscot group presents a five-year historical summary in addition to the two years of its financial statements. It voluntarily changes policy in 2025. For the financial statements themselves, what is the minimum IAS 8 requirement?L3
- Brylbal is hesitant to apply its new policy retrospectively: the finance director prefers to 'show the catch-up in 2025 profit so investors see it'. Retrospective application is practicable (case data). What should he be told?L3
- The Quodac group applies a new policy retrospectively that increases assets whose tax base does not change (case data). The draft restatement table adjusts the asset line items and retained earnings, but neither deferred tax nor comparative profit. How should it be assessed?L4