Workpapers
Workpaper template
Change classification matrix
- Prepared by
- AI-assisted draft
- Reviewed by
- Not reviewed — human review required
- Status
- Published
Objective of the workpaper
For each change of the period (one instance per change), describe the facts and the date on which the information was available, review the definitions, the conditions for a change in accounting policy and the nature of an estimate, measure where useful what the classification puts at stake (gap between prospective treatment and retrospective restatement), then classify the change, give the rationale and route it to its treatment and disclosures.
10 sections · 20 blocks · 1 calculation · 0 entries
- IAS 8 §5
- IAS 8 §14
- IAS 8 §16
- IAS 8 §17
- IAS 8 §19
- IAS 8 §20
- IAS 8 §32
- IAS 8 §32A
- IAS 8 §34
- IAS 8 §34A
- IAS 8 §35
- IAS 8 §41
- IAS 8 §48
- IAS 8
- IAS 8 §29
- IAS 8 §39
- IAS 8 §49
Work this workpaper as a mission
Each case that uses this template opens in the mission workspace: data, analysis, calculation, entries, conclusion and review, with your progress saved.
- Policy, estimate or error? Reasoned sorting of ten changes in a distribution SMEOpen the mission · Change 1 — van useful life
- Policy, estimate or error? Reasoned sorting of ten changes in a distribution SMEOpen the mission · Change 4 — December 20X4 rent
- Policy, estimate or error? Reasoned sorting of ten changes in a distribution SMEOpen the mission · Change 9 — supplier dispute
- Receivables impairment: change in technique, revision of a provision or error? Classification and disclosureOpen the mission · Item (a) — loss allowance
- Receivables impairment: change in technique, revision of a provision or error? Classification and disclosureOpen the mission · Item (b) — returns provision
- Receivables impairment: change in technique, revision of a provision or error? Classification and disclosureOpen the mission · Item (c) — credit note of 26,000
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail groupOpen the mission · Point (a) — supplier rebates
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail groupOpen the mission · Point (b) — cost formula
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail groupOpen the mission · Point (d) — racking
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail groupOpen the mission · Point (e) — carrier dispute
10 instances from the cases: the calculations and entries below are run by the calculation engine.
- File and entity
- Policy, estimate or error? Reasoned sorting of ten changes in a distribution SME
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify each of the ten changes: change in accounting policy, change in estimate, error (current or prior period) or neither.
- Are changes 2, 7 and 8 permitted changes in accounting policy, and under which rules?
- Measure what the classification of change 9 puts at stake: corrected 20X5 profit and profit if the payment were wrongly treated as an error correction.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
DELIVERY_VAN_USEFUL_LIFE_5_TO_7_YEARS
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
MILEAGE_TRACKING_SET_UP_IN_20X5
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
0
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Change in accounting estimate
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NEW_INFORMATION_ON_USE_NOT_AN_ERROR
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_A_POLICY_CHANGE
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
New information or more experience
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
MILEAGE_DATA_FIRST_AVAILABLE_IN_20X5
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
Prospective recognition
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Policy, estimate or error? Reasoned sorting of ten changes in a distribution SME
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify each of the ten changes: change in accounting policy, change in estimate, error (current or prior period) or neither.
- Are changes 2, 7 and 8 permitted changes in accounting policy, and under which rules?
- Measure what the classification of change 9 puts at stake: corrected 20X5 profit and profit if the payment were wrongly treated as an error correction.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
WAREHOUSE_RENT_DECEMBER_20X4_NOT_RECOGNISED
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
INVOICED_BEFORE_20X4_AUTHORISATION
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
0
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Prior period error
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
RELIABLE_INFORMATION_AVAILABLE_AT_AUTHORISATION
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_A_POLICY_CHANGE
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not an estimate)
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_AN_ESTIMATE
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
Retrospective restatement
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Policy, estimate or error? Reasoned sorting of ten changes in a distribution SME
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify each of the ten changes: change in accounting policy, change in estimate, error (current or prior period) or neither.
- Are changes 2, 7 and 8 permitted changes in accounting policy, and under which rules?
- Measure what the classification of change 9 puts at stake: corrected 20X5 profit and profit if the payment were wrongly treated as an error correction.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
SUPPLIER_CLAIM_SETTLED_IN_20X5
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
OUTCOME_KNOWN_IN_20X5
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
308,000
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
296,000
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
12,000
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
OUTCOME_OF_A_CONTINGENCY_NOT_AN_ERROR
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_A_POLICY_CHANGE
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not an estimate)
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_AN_ESTIMATE_REVISION
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Receivables impairment: change in technique, revision of a provision or error? Classification and disclosure
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify the three items (a), (b) and (c).
- Is the CFO's proposal for (a) acceptable?
- Measure what the classification of (b) puts at stake for 20X5 profit.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
LOSS_ALLOWANCE_ROLL_RATE_MODEL
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
PAYMENT_HISTORIES_AVAILABLE_SINCE_20X5
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
0
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Change in accounting estimate
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
CHANGE_OF_TECHNIQUE_NOT_OF_MEASUREMENT_BASIS
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_A_POLICY_CHANGE
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
Change in a measurement technique
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
OLD_MATRIX_CORRECTLY_APPLIED
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
Prospective recognition
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Receivables impairment: change in technique, revision of a provision or error? Classification and disclosure
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify the three items (a), (b) and (c).
- Is the CFO's proposal for (a) acceptable?
- Measure what the classification of (b) puts at stake for 20X5 profit.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
RETURNS_PROVISION_REVISED
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
NEW_RETURN_STATISTICS_20X5
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
1,238,000
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
1,206,000
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
32,000
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Change in accounting estimate
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NEW_INFORMATION_NOT_AN_ERROR
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_A_POLICY_CHANGE
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
New information or more experience
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
MORE_DETAILED_STATISTICS
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
Prospective recognition
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Receivables impairment: change in technique, revision of a provision or error? Classification and disclosure
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify the three items (a), (b) and (c).
- Is the CFO's proposal for (a) acceptable?
- Measure what the classification of (b) puts at stake for 20X5 profit.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
CREDIT_NOTE_POSTED_TWICE_DECEMBER_20X3
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
CUSTOMER_STATEMENT_BEFORE_20X3_APPROVAL
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
0
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Prior period error
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
RELIABLE_INFORMATION_AVAILABLE_NOT_USED
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_A_POLICY_CHANGE
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not an estimate)
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_AN_ESTIMATE
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
Retrospective restatement
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail group
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify points (a) to (g) of the closing memo.
- Is the move to FIFO permitted? What about standard X?
- Measure what the CFO's proposal on point (e) puts at stake.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
VOLUME_REBATES_NEVER_RECOGNISED
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
INFORMATION_AVAILABLE_AT_EACH_AUTHORISATION
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
0
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Prior period error
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
RELIABLE_INFORMATION_NOT_USED
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_A_POLICY_CHANGE
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not an estimate)
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_AN_ESTIMATE_REVISION
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
Retrospective restatement
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail group
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify points (a) to (g) of the closing memo.
- Is the move to FIFO permitted? What about standard X?
- Measure what the CFO's proposal on point (e) puts at stake.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
BRICOLAGE_WEIGHTED_AVERAGE_TO_FIFO
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
DECIDED_FOR_20X5
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
0
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Change in accounting policy
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
CHANGE_OF_COST_FORMULA_IS_A_POLICY
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
PHYSICAL_FLOW_AND_GROUP_CONSISTENCY
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not an estimate)
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_AN_ESTIMATE
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions)
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail group
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify points (a) to (g) of the closing memo.
- Is the move to FIFO permitted? What about standard X?
- Measure what the CFO's proposal on point (e) puts at stake.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
RACKING_LIFE_AND_RESIDUAL_REVISED
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
TECHNICAL_NOTE_JANUARY_20X5
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
0
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Change in accounting estimate
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NEW_CIRCUMSTANCES_FORKLIFTS
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_A_POLICY_CHANGE
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
New information or more experience
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
ACCELERATED_WEAR
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
Prospective recognition
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail group
- Case tasks documented here
- Classify points (a) to (g) of the closing memo.
- Is the move to FIFO permitted? What about standard X?
- Measure what the CFO's proposal on point (e) puts at stake.
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
CARRIER_CLAIM_SETTLED_IN_20X5
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
OUTCOME_KNOWN_IN_20X5
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
3,075,000
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
3,000,000
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
75,000
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
OUTCOME_OF_A_CONTINGENCY_NOT_AN_ERROR
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_A_POLICY_CHANGE
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
Not applicable (not an estimate)
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NOT_AN_ESTIMATE_REVISION
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Classification documentedPass
- Condition for a policy change reviewedPass
- Nature of the estimate revision reviewedPass
- Treatment selectedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
Inputs
InputsChange examined: facts, amounts and scope
TextRequired
Date on which the information was available, compared with the authorisation date of the statements concerned
TextRequired
Case data: dates come from the documents. Information that was available at authorisation and could reasonably be expected to be obtained points to an error; new information points to an estimate (para. 5 and 34).
Published accounting policies concerned
Text
Profit for the period with prospective treatment
Number
Teaching assumption: optional sensitivity calculation; the classification follows from the standard, not from the amount.
Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Number
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Definitions and nature of the change
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §41IAS 8 §48
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Accounting policy: principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
- Accounting estimate: monetary amount subject to measurement uncertainty
- Prior period error: reliable information available at authorisation, not used or misused
- Current period error discovered before authorisation: corrected before issue
- Estimates are revisable by nature; outcome of a contingency: not an error correction
Change in accounting policy: conditions and application
AnalysisIAS 8 §14IAS 8 §16IAS 8 §17IAS 8 §19IAS 8 §20
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Change required by an IFRS or reliable and more relevant information
- First application of the revaluation model (IAS 16, IAS 38): dealt with under those standards, outside IAS 8
- Initial application of an IFRS: transitional provisions, otherwise retrospective application
- Transactions that differ in substance or are new: not a change in policy
- Early application of an IFRS: not a voluntary change
Accounting estimate: development and change
AnalysisIAS 8 §32IAS 8 §32AIAS 8 §34IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- The estimate serves the measurement objective set by a policy
- Measurement techniques and inputs identified
- Revision due to new circumstances, new information or more experience
- Change in an input or a technique: change in estimate, unless it corrects an error
- Change in measurement basis: change in accounting policy
- Difficult distinction: treated as a change in estimate
What the classification puts at stake
CalculationsIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §34
Profit gap: prospective − retrospective
Calculation
Profit for the period with prospective treatment ; − Profit for the period with retrospective restatement
Teaching sensitivity calculation: it measures what is at stake, it never determines the classification.
Classification and treatment
JudgmentIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §14IAS 8 §34AIAS 8 §35IAS 8 §41
Classification of the change
JudgmentRequired
Change in accounting policy / Change in accounting estimate / Prior period error / Current period error / Neither a change nor an error (event of the period)
Professional judgement: where policy and estimate are hard to tell apart, para. 35 points to the estimate; an error requires information available at authorisation (para. 5).
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Is the change in policy permitted?
JudgmentRequired
Required by an IFRS / Reliable and more relevant information demonstrated / Gain in relevance not demonstrated: change refused / Not applicable (not a change in policy)
Professional judgement: the demonstration of more relevant information rests on the facts of the case; IAS 8 sets no numerical criterion.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Nature of the estimate revision
JudgmentRequired
Change in an input / Change in a measurement technique / New information or more experience / Not applicable (not an estimate)
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Accounting treatment
ChoiceRequired
Retrospective application (voluntary change or no transitional provisions) / Transitional provisions of the new IFRS / Revaluation under IAS 16 or IAS 38 / Retrospective restatement / Prospective recognition / Correction in the current statements before authorisation / In profit or loss of the period (outcome)
Routing to disclosures
DisclosureIAS 8IAS 8 §29IAS 8 §39IAS 8 §49
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Initial application of an IFRS: para. 28 disclosures
- Voluntary change: para. 29 disclosures
- Change in estimate: nature and amount (para. 39)
- Error correction: para. 49 disclosures
Conclusion
ConclusionClassification, treatment and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References