Workpapers
Workpaper template
Accounting policy memo
- Prepared by
- AI-assisted draft
- Reviewed by
- Not reviewed — human review required
- Status
- Published
Objective of the workpaper
Describe the transaction, look for the IFRS that specifically applies to it and the effect of materiality; where no IFRS applies, document in order the sources consulted (IFRSs dealing with similar issues, Conceptual Framework, other consistent pronouncements), check consistency by category, then write the policy adopted and its rationale.
8 sections · 16 blocks · 0 calculations · 0 entries
- IAS 8 §5
- IAS 8 §7
- IAS 8 §8
- IAS 8 §10
- IAS 8 §11
- IAS 8 §12
- IAS 8 §13
Work this workpaper as a mission
Each case that uses this template opens in the mission workspace: data, analysis, calculation, entries, conclusion and review, with your progress saved.
- Transaction with no applicable standard: developing and documenting an accounting policyOpen the mission · Group policy — certificates
- Transaction with no applicable standard: developing and documenting an accounting policyOpen the mission · Halvenor Sud certificate purchases
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail groupOpen the mission
3 instances from the cases: the calculations and entries below are run by the calculation engine.
- File and entity
- Transaction with no applicable standard: developing and documenting an accounting policy
- Case tasks documented here
- Does an IFRS specifically apply to the certificates? Which approach must be followed?
- Assess approach (A) adopted by management against the hierarchy of sources and the required qualities.
- What should be done with the practices of Halvenor Nord and Halvenor Sud on consolidation?
- Post the 20X5 closing entries under the group's policy.
Inputs
InputsDescription of the transaction and of its economic effects
TextRequired
FREE_TRANSFERABLE_CERTIFICATES_AND_SURRENDER_OBLIGATION
IFRSs and Conceptual Framework consulted
TextRequired
NO_SPECIFIC_IFRS_SIMILAR_IFRS_AND_FRAMEWORK_REVIEWED
Pronouncements and practices examined
Text
FOREIGN_STANDARD_SETTER_NET_APPROACH
Amount at stake
Number
42,000
Materiality threshold set by management
Number
25,000
Case data: IAS 8 sets no numerical threshold; the threshold is a management input.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Applicable IFRS and materiality
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §7IAS 8 §8
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Search for an IFRS that specifically applies
- Policy determined by that IFRS where it exists
- Immaterial effect: IFRS policy need not be applied
- No deliberate departure to achieve a particular presentation
Developing a policy where no IFRS applies
AnalysisIAS 8 §10IAS 8 §11IAS 8 §12
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Relevant and reliable information (faithful representation, neutrality, prudence, completeness)
- Economic substance, not legal form only
- First: IFRSs dealing with similar and related issues
- Then: definitions, criteria and concepts of the Conceptual Framework
- Possibly: other standard-setters, literature and industry practice
- No conflict with the higher sources
Consistency by category
AnalysisIAS 8 §13
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Same policy for similar transactions
- Categorisation required or permitted by an IFRS
- Consistent application within each category
Policy and materiality
JudgmentIAS 8 §8IAS 8 §10IAS 8 §11IAS 8 §12
Basis of the policy
JudgmentRequired
Analogy with an IFRS dealing with similar issues
IFRS that specifically applies / Analogy with an IFRS dealing with similar issues / Definitions and concepts of the Conceptual Framework / Consistent pronouncement of another standard-setter
Management's professional judgement (para. 10): the policy chosen in the case is not presented as required by the standard.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
NET_OBLIGATION_REFLECTS_SUBSTANCE_CONSISTENT_WITH_FRAMEWORK
Departure from IFRSs
JudgmentRequired
No departure
No departure / Immaterial departure, not deliberate: acceptable / Material or deliberate departure: to be corrected
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
GROUP_POLICY_APPLIED_TO_ALL_SITES
Conclusion
ConclusionWording of the accounting policy
TextRequired
NET_LIABILITY_APPROACH_AT_MARKET_PRICE
Policy approved, scope and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Basis of the policy documentedPass
- Possible departure assessedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Transaction with no applicable standard: developing and documenting an accounting policy
- Case tasks documented here
- Does an IFRS specifically apply to the certificates? Which approach must be followed?
- Assess approach (A) adopted by management against the hierarchy of sources and the required qualities.
- What should be done with the practices of Halvenor Nord and Halvenor Sud on consolidation?
- Post the 20X5 closing entries under the group's policy.
Inputs
InputsDescription of the transaction and of its economic effects
TextRequired
SMALL_CERTIFICATE_PURCHASES_EXPENSED
IFRSs and Conceptual Framework consulted
TextRequired
GROUP_POLICY_NET_APPROACH
Pronouncements and practices examined
Text
Amount at stake
Number
2,800
Materiality threshold set by management
Number
25,000
Case data: IAS 8 sets no numerical threshold; the threshold is a management input.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Applicable IFRS and materiality
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §7IAS 8 §8
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Search for an IFRS that specifically applies
- Policy determined by that IFRS where it exists
- Immaterial effect: IFRS policy need not be applied
- No deliberate departure to achieve a particular presentation
Developing a policy where no IFRS applies
AnalysisIAS 8 §10IAS 8 §11IAS 8 §12
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Relevant and reliable information (faithful representation, neutrality, prudence, completeness)
- Economic substance, not legal form only
- First: IFRSs dealing with similar and related issues
- Then: definitions, criteria and concepts of the Conceptual Framework
- Possibly: other standard-setters, literature and industry practice
- No conflict with the higher sources
Consistency by category
AnalysisIAS 8 §13
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Same policy for similar transactions
- Categorisation required or permitted by an IFRS
- Consistent application within each category
Policy and materiality
JudgmentIAS 8 §8IAS 8 §10IAS 8 §11IAS 8 §12
Basis of the policy
JudgmentRequired
Analogy with an IFRS dealing with similar issues
IFRS that specifically applies / Analogy with an IFRS dealing with similar issues / Definitions and concepts of the Conceptual Framework / Consistent pronouncement of another standard-setter
Management's professional judgement (para. 10): the policy chosen in the case is not presented as required by the standard.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
SAME_GROUP_POLICY
Departure from IFRSs
JudgmentRequired
Immaterial departure, not deliberate: acceptable
No departure / Immaterial departure, not deliberate: acceptable / Material or deliberate departure: to be corrected
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
BELOW_THRESHOLD_NOT_DELIBERATE
Conclusion
ConclusionWording of the accounting policy
TextRequired
NO_ADJUSTMENT_FOR_IMMATERIAL_PURCHASES
Policy approved, scope and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Basis of the policy documentedPass
- Possible departure assessedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Review file of accounting changes and restatements of a retail group
- Case tasks documented here
- Set the group's policy for the reuse credits.
- Present the entries: restatements, Vasquerel Jardin adjustment, racking and reuse credits.
Inputs
InputsDescription of the transaction and of its economic effects
TextRequired
REUSE_CREDITS_REDEEMABLE_IN_CASH
IFRSs and Conceptual Framework consulted
TextRequired
NO_SPECIFIC_IFRS_SIMILAR_IFRS_AND_FRAMEWORK
Pronouncements and practices examined
Text
Amount at stake
Number
64,000
Materiality threshold set by management
Number
150,000
Case data: IAS 8 sets no numerical threshold; the threshold is a management input.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Applicable IFRS and materiality
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §7IAS 8 §8
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Search for an IFRS that specifically applies
- Policy determined by that IFRS where it exists
- Immaterial effect: IFRS policy need not be applied
- No deliberate departure to achieve a particular presentation
Developing a policy where no IFRS applies
AnalysisIAS 8 §10IAS 8 §11IAS 8 §12
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Relevant and reliable information (faithful representation, neutrality, prudence, completeness)
- Economic substance, not legal form only
- First: IFRSs dealing with similar and related issues
- Then: definitions, criteria and concepts of the Conceptual Framework
- Possibly: other standard-setters, literature and industry practice
- No conflict with the higher sources
Consistency by category
AnalysisIAS 8 §13
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Same policy for similar transactions
- Categorisation required or permitted by an IFRS
- Consistent application within each category
Policy and materiality
JudgmentIAS 8 §8IAS 8 §10IAS 8 §11IAS 8 §12
Basis of the policy
JudgmentRequired
Definitions and concepts of the Conceptual Framework
IFRS that specifically applies / Analogy with an IFRS dealing with similar issues / Definitions and concepts of the Conceptual Framework / Consistent pronouncement of another standard-setter
Management's professional judgement (para. 10): the policy chosen in the case is not presented as required by the standard.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
RIGHT_TO_CASH_IS_AN_ASSET_INCOME_WHEN_EARNED
Departure from IFRSs
JudgmentRequired
No departure
No departure / Immaterial departure, not deliberate: acceptable / Material or deliberate departure: to be corrected
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
ONE_PRESENTATION_FOR_THE_GROUP
Conclusion
ConclusionWording of the accounting policy
TextRequired
RECEIVABLE_AND_OTHER_INCOME_WHEN_CREDIT_EARNED
Policy approved, scope and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Basis of the policy documentedPass
- Possible departure assessedPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
Inputs
InputsDescription of the transaction and of its economic effects
TextRequired
IFRSs and Conceptual Framework consulted
TextRequired
Pronouncements and practices examined
Text
Amount at stake
Number
Materiality threshold set by management
Number
Case data: IAS 8 sets no numerical threshold; the threshold is a management input.
Supporting evidence
EvidenceEvidence obtained and referenced (category, document reference)
EvidenceRequired
Applicable IFRS and materiality
AnalysisIAS 8 §5IAS 8 §7IAS 8 §8
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Search for an IFRS that specifically applies
- Policy determined by that IFRS where it exists
- Immaterial effect: IFRS policy need not be applied
- No deliberate departure to achieve a particular presentation
Developing a policy where no IFRS applies
AnalysisIAS 8 §10IAS 8 §11IAS 8 §12
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Relevant and reliable information (faithful representation, neutrality, prudence, completeness)
- Economic substance, not legal form only
- First: IFRSs dealing with similar and related issues
- Then: definitions, criteria and concepts of the Conceptual Framework
- Possibly: other standard-setters, literature and industry practice
- No conflict with the higher sources
Consistency by category
AnalysisIAS 8 §13
Points reviewed
ChecklistRequired
- Same policy for similar transactions
- Categorisation required or permitted by an IFRS
- Consistent application within each category
Policy and materiality
JudgmentIAS 8 §8IAS 8 §10IAS 8 §11IAS 8 §12
Basis of the policy
JudgmentRequired
IFRS that specifically applies / Analogy with an IFRS dealing with similar issues / Definitions and concepts of the Conceptual Framework / Consistent pronouncement of another standard-setter
Management's professional judgement (para. 10): the policy chosen in the case is not presented as required by the standard.
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Departure from IFRSs
JudgmentRequired
No departure / Immaterial departure, not deliberate: acceptable / Material or deliberate departure: to be corrected
Rationale: facts relied on, analysis, alternative rejected
TextRequired
Conclusion
ConclusionWording of the accounting policy
TextRequired
Policy approved, scope and points submitted to the reviewer
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references
References