IAS 32 · Workpapers (Step 4 of 5)
Workpaper template
- Course
- Exercises
- Case studies
- Workpapers
- Exams
Offsetting a financial asset and a financial liability: legally enforceable right, intention to settle and net amount presented
- Prepared by
- AI-assisted draft
- Reviewed by
- Not reviewed — human review required
- Status
- Published
Objective of the workpaper
For each counterparty, record the amounts of the asset and of the liability, the right of set-off (current, not contingent on a future event, enforceable in the normal course of business, on default and on insolvency) and the settlement practices. Both criteria must be met: otherwise the gross amounts are presented. Amounts and facts are case data.
8 sections · 13 blocks · 1 calculation · 0 entries
- IAS 32 §42
Work this workpaper as a mission
Each case that uses this template opens in the mission workspace: data, analysis, calculation, entries, conclusion and review, with your progress saved.
- Offsetting, puttable instruments, cooperative member shares and the FICE project: a classification and presentation fileOpen the mission · Deposit and loan — Alvia Bank
- Offsetting, puttable instruments, cooperative member shares and the FICE project: a classification and presentation fileOpen the mission · Receivable and debt — Brenval
- File on issued financial instruments: liability / equity classification, split of a convertible bond, distributions and offsetting (IAS 32)Open the mission
3 instances from the cases: the calculations and entries below are run by the calculation engine.
- File and entity
- Offsetting, puttable instruments, cooperative member shares and the FICE project: a classification and presentation file
- Case tasks documented here
- Alvia: are both offsetting criteria met?
- Alvia: compute the net amount presented.
- Brenval: can the receivable and the debt be offset?
Facts and data
InputsCounterparty, instruments concerned and set-off agreement
TextRequired
DEPOSIT_AND_LOAN_WITH_THE_SAME_BANK_UNDER_A_MASTER_SET_OFF_AGREEMENT
Amount of the financial asset recognised
Number
400,000
Amount of the financial liability recognised
Number
150,000
Right of set-off: current or contingent on a future event, enforceable in the normal course of business, on default and on insolvency
Text
ENFORCEABLE_IN_THE_NORMAL_COURSE_ON_DEFAULT_AND_ON_INSOLVENCY
Intention to settle net or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously: past practices and risk management
Text
BALANCES_SETTLED_NET_EVERY_MONTH_DOCUMENTED_PRACTICE
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (set-off agreement, legal opinion, settlement statements)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the two offsetting criteria
AnalysisIAS 32 §42
Points examined: offsetting
ChecklistRequired
- Current right of set-off, not contingent on a future event
- Right enforceable in the normal course of business, on default and on insolvency
- Intention to settle net or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously
- Both criteria are met together; otherwise gross presentation
Calculations
CalculationsIAS 32 §42
Net amount presented (asset − liability)
Calculation
250,000
Amount of the financial asset recognised ; − Amount of the financial liability recognised
Judgment: right of set-off and intention to settle
JudgmentIAS 32 §42
Conclusion on the two criteria
JudgmentRequired
Both criteria met: net amount
Both criteria met: net amount / Right of set-off not met: gross amounts / Intention to settle not met: gross amounts
Professional judgment: a right contingent on a future event, such as a default, does not meet the criterion of a current right; the intention is shown by practices, not by a statement.
Rationale: enforceability of the right and settlement practices
Text
CURRENT_ENFORCEABLE_RIGHT_AND_DOCUMENTED_NET_SETTLEMENT
Items to document for the offsetting disclosures
DisclosureIAS 32 §42
Information to prepare on offsetting
Checklist
- Gross amounts, amounts set off and net amounts presented
- Amounts subject to a set-off agreement but not set off
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on each of the two criteria, then net amount presented or gross amounts
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Counterparty and agreement describedPass
- Criteria judged and supportedPass
- Asset = net amount + liabilityPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- Offsetting, puttable instruments, cooperative member shares and the FICE project: a classification and presentation file
- Case tasks documented here
- Alvia: are both offsetting criteria met?
- Alvia: compute the net amount presented.
- Brenval: can the receivable and the debt be offset?
Facts and data
InputsCounterparty, instruments concerned and set-off agreement
TextRequired
RECEIVABLE_AND_DEBT_WITH_THE_SAME_CUSTOMER
Amount of the financial asset recognised
Number
220,000
Amount of the financial liability recognised
Number
90,000
Right of set-off: current or contingent on a future event, enforceable in the normal course of business, on default and on insolvency
Text
SET_OFF_ONLY_IF_BRENVAL_DEFAULTS_CONTINGENT_ON_A_FUTURE_EVENT
Intention to settle net or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously: past practices and risk management
Text
BALANCES_SETTLED_GROSS
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (set-off agreement, legal opinion, settlement statements)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the two offsetting criteria
AnalysisIAS 32 §42
Points examined: offsetting
ChecklistRequired
- Current right of set-off, not contingent on a future event
- Right enforceable in the normal course of business, on default and on insolvency
- Intention to settle net or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously
- Both criteria are met together; otherwise gross presentation
Calculations
CalculationsIAS 32 §42
Net amount presented (asset − liability)
Calculation
130,000
Amount of the financial asset recognised ; − Amount of the financial liability recognised
Judgment: right of set-off and intention to settle
JudgmentIAS 32 §42
Conclusion on the two criteria
JudgmentRequired
Right of set-off not met: gross amounts
Both criteria met: net amount / Right of set-off not met: gross amounts / Intention to settle not met: gross amounts
Professional judgment: a right contingent on a future event, such as a default, does not meet the criterion of a current right; the intention is shown by practices, not by a statement.
Rationale: enforceability of the right and settlement practices
Text
THE_RIGHT_IS_NOT_CURRENT
Items to document for the offsetting disclosures
DisclosureIAS 32 §42
Information to prepare on offsetting
Checklist
- Gross amounts, amounts set off and net amounts presented
- Amounts subject to a set-off agreement but not set off
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on each of the two criteria, then net amount presented or gross amounts
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Counterparty and agreement describedPass
- Criteria judged and supportedPass
- Asset = net amount + liabilityPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
- File and entity
- File on issued financial instruments: liability / equity classification, split of a convertible bond, distributions and offsetting (IAS 32)
- Case tasks documented here
- Elvane Bank: are both offsetting criteria met?
- Elvane Bank: compute the net amount presented.
Facts and data
InputsCounterparty, instruments concerned and set-off agreement
TextRequired
DEPOSIT_AND_OVERDRAFT_WITH_THE_SAME_BANK_UNDER_A_CASH_MANAGEMENT_AGREEMENT
Amount of the financial asset recognised
Number
680,000
Amount of the financial liability recognised
Number
410,000
Right of set-off: current or contingent on a future event, enforceable in the normal course of business, on default and on insolvency
Text
CURRENT_RIGHT_ENFORCEABLE_IN_THE_NORMAL_COURSE_ON_DEFAULT_AND_ON_INSOLVENCY
Intention to settle net or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously: past practices and risk management
Text
BALANCES_SETTLED_NET_EVERY_DAY
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (set-off agreement, legal opinion, settlement statements)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the two offsetting criteria
AnalysisIAS 32 §42
Points examined: offsetting
ChecklistRequired
- Current right of set-off, not contingent on a future event
- Right enforceable in the normal course of business, on default and on insolvency
- Intention to settle net or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously
- Both criteria are met together; otherwise gross presentation
Calculations
CalculationsIAS 32 §42
Net amount presented (asset − liability)
Calculation
270,000
Amount of the financial asset recognised ; − Amount of the financial liability recognised
Judgment: right of set-off and intention to settle
JudgmentIAS 32 §42
Conclusion on the two criteria
JudgmentRequired
Both criteria met: net amount
Both criteria met: net amount / Right of set-off not met: gross amounts / Intention to settle not met: gross amounts
Professional judgment: a right contingent on a future event, such as a default, does not meet the criterion of a current right; the intention is shown by practices, not by a statement.
Rationale: enforceability of the right and settlement practices
Text
CURRENT_ENFORCEABLE_RIGHT_AND_DAILY_NET_SETTLEMENT
Items to document for the offsetting disclosures
DisclosureIAS 32 §42
Information to prepare on offsetting
Checklist
- Gross amounts, amounts set off and net amounts presented
- Amounts subject to a set-off agreement but not set off
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on each of the two criteria, then net amount presented or gross amounts
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References
Checks and financial statement impact
- Counterparty and agreement describedPass
- Criteria judged and supportedPass
- Asset = net amount + liabilityPass
- Assets
- 0
- Liabilities
- 0
- Profit or loss
- 0
- OCI
- 0
- Equity
- 0
Facts and data
InputsCounterparty, instruments concerned and set-off agreement
TextRequired
Amount of the financial asset recognised
Number
Amount of the financial liability recognised
Number
Right of set-off: current or contingent on a future event, enforceable in the normal course of business, on default and on insolvency
Text
Intention to settle net or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously: past practices and risk management
Text
Supporting documents
EvidenceDocuments obtained and referenced (set-off agreement, legal opinion, settlement statements)
EvidenceRequired
Analysis of the two offsetting criteria
AnalysisIAS 32 §42
Points examined: offsetting
ChecklistRequired
- Current right of set-off, not contingent on a future event
- Right enforceable in the normal course of business, on default and on insolvency
- Intention to settle net or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously
- Both criteria are met together; otherwise gross presentation
Calculations
CalculationsIAS 32 §42
Net amount presented (asset − liability)
Calculation
Amount of the financial asset recognised ; − Amount of the financial liability recognised
Judgment: right of set-off and intention to settle
JudgmentIAS 32 §42
Conclusion on the two criteria
JudgmentRequired
Both criteria met: net amount / Right of set-off not met: gross amounts / Intention to settle not met: gross amounts
Professional judgment: a right contingent on a future event, such as a default, does not meet the criterion of a current right; the intention is shown by practices, not by a statement.
Rationale: enforceability of the right and settlement practices
Text
Items to document for the offsetting disclosures
DisclosureIAS 32 §42
Information to prepare on offsetting
Checklist
- Gross amounts, amounts set off and net amounts presented
- Amounts subject to a set-off agreement but not set off
Conclusion
ConclusionSupported conclusion on each of the two criteria, then net amount presented or gross amounts
ConclusionRequired
Normative references
ReferencesNormative references cited in this workpaper
References