Skip to main content
IFRS Academy

CERTYNEX IFRS ACADEMY

Search the Academy

Home
My learning path
Exercises & quizzes
Cases
Workpapers
Exams
My progress

CoreBeginner · Intermediate · Advanced · Expert

Transfer of control and obligations satisfied over time

Learning objectives

  • Explain the notion of control of an asset: the ability to direct its use and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from it.L1, L2
  • Determine whether an obligation is satisfied over time: the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits, the performance creates or enhances an asset controlled by the customer, or the asset has no alternative use to the entity and the entity has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date.L2, L3, L4

Normative references

  • IFRS 15 §31The entity recognises revenue when (or as) it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a promised good or service to the customer; an asset is transferred when (or as) the customer obtains control of it.
  • IFRS 15 §32For each performance obligation, the entity determines at contract inception whether it is satisfied over time (paragraphs 35-37) or at a point in time (paragraph 38); if the criteria for satisfaction over time are not met, the obligation is satisfied at a point in time.
  • IFRS 15 §33Control of an asset is the ability to direct its use and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from it, including the ability to prevent other entities from doing so. The benefits are the potential cash flows (inflows or savings in outflows) that can be obtained directly or indirectly, for example by using, consuming, selling, exchanging, pledging or holding the asset.
  • IFRS 15 §35Control transfers over time, and revenue is recognised over time, if one of the following criteria is met: (a) the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of the entity's performance as the entity performs; (b) the performance creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as it is created or enhanced; (c) the performance creates an asset with no alternative use to the entity and the entity has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date.
  • IFRS 15 §36An asset has no alternative use to the entity if the entity is either restricted contractually from readily directing it for another use during its creation or enhancement, or limited practically from doing so in its completed state. The assessment is made at contract inception and is revised only if there is an approved contract modification that substantively changes the performance obligation.
  • IFRS 15 §37To assess the enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date (criterion 35(c)), the entity considers the terms of the contract and applicable law. That right must, at all times throughout the duration of the contract, entitle it to an amount that at least compensates it for performance completed to date if the contract is terminated by the customer or another party for reasons other than the entity's failure to perform as promised.
  • IFRS 15 §B1The application guidance (Appendix B) is organised into topics: performance obligations satisfied over time, methods for measuring progress, sales with a right of return, warranties, principal versus agent considerations, customer options for additional goods or services, unexercised rights, non-refundable upfront fees, licensing, repurchase agreements, consignment arrangements, bill-and-hold arrangements, customer acceptance and disaggregation of revenue. The appendix is an integral part of the standard.
  • IFRS 15 §B2Restates, in accordance with paragraph 35, the three criteria for recognition over time (simultaneous receipt and consumption, customer control of the asset created or enhanced, no alternative use with an enforceable right to payment) and refers for each to the corresponding application guidance (B3-B4, B5, then B6 to B13).
  • IFRS 15 §B3For some types of performance obligations, in particular routine or recurring services (for example, cleaning), it is evident that the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit as the entity performs, which meets criterion 35(a).
  • IFRS 15 §B4When the analysis is not evident, criterion 35(a) is met if another entity taking over the remaining performance would not need to substantially re-perform the work completed to date. For this test, the entity disregards potential contractual or practical limitations on such a transfer and presumes that the other entity would not have the benefit of any asset that it still controls.
  • IFRS 15 §B5For criterion 35(b), the entity applies the principles of control (31 to 34 and 38) to the asset being created or enhanced, which may be tangible or intangible (for example, work in progress).
  • IFRS 15In assessing whether an asset has an alternative use to the entity, the effects of contractual restrictions and practical limitations on its ability to readily direct the asset for another use, for example selling it to a different customer, are considered; the possibility of the contract being terminated is not relevant.
  • IFRS 15A contractual restriction prevents an alternative use only if it is substantive, i.e. if the customer could enforce its rights to the promised asset if the entity sought to direct it for another use. It is not substantive when the asset is largely interchangeable with other assets that could be transferred to another customer without breaching the contract and without incurring significant additional costs.
  • IFRS 15 §B8A practical limitation on directing an asset for another use exists if the entity would incur significant economic losses to do so, either because of significant costs to rework the asset or because it could only sell it at a significant loss; this may be the case for assets with customer-specific design specifications or located in remote areas.
  • IFRS 15 §B9An enforceable right to payment requires that, throughout the contract, the entity can obtain at least compensation for performance completed to date if the customer or another party terminates the contract for reasons other than the entity's failure to perform. That compensation must approximate the selling price of the goods or services transferred to date (for example, costs incurred plus a reasonable profit margin), not merely the entity's lost profit. The reasonable margin need not equal the margin expected if the contract were carried out in full: the entity must be able to obtain either a share of the expected margin that reasonably reflects how far it had performed before termination, or a reasonable return on its cost of capital (or its usual operating margin on similar contracts) where the contract-specific margin exceeds the return it usually earns.
  • IFRS 15 §B10The right to payment for performance completed to date does not have to be a present, unconditional right: often the entity has an unconditional right only when an agreed milestone is reached or the obligation is fully satisfied. To assess the right, the entity considers whether it would have an enforceable right to demand or keep payment for the performance completed if the contract were terminated early for a reason other than its own failure to perform.
  • IFRS 15 §B11A customer may be able to terminate the contract only at specified times, or not at all. If the customer acts to terminate when it has no right to do so at that time (including by failing to perform as promised), the contract or the law may allow the entity to keep transferring the promised goods or services and to require the promised consideration; the entity then has a right to payment for performance completed to date.
  • IFRS 15 §B12Whether a right to payment exists and is enforceable is assessed in the light of the contract and of any legislation or case law that may supplement or override it: a right granted by law or administrative practice, case law depriving similar terms of effect, or a customary practice of not enforcing such rights that makes the right unenforceable in that legal environment. Waiving the right from time to time does not remove it if it remains enforceable in the contract concerned.
  • IFRS 15 §B13The payment schedule in the contract does not necessarily show that the entity has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date: it sets when and how much is payable, but the contract may, for example, provide that consideration received is refundable for reasons other than the entity's failure to perform.

Original summaries of the paragraphs (reference register), never a quotation of the standard.

27 questions